These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9249266)

  • 61. [Rationale for the maximum permissible concentration of porophor P-18-S in the air of work place].
    Kashmanova GN; Zenina GA; Vinogradov SIu; Komiagina EN
    Gig Sanit; 1993 Jul; (7):47-8. PubMed ID: 8224986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparison of environment and mice in static and mechanically ventilated isolator cages with different air velocities and ventilation designs.
    Memarzadeh F; Harrison PC; Riskowski GL; Henze T
    Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci; 2004 Jan; 43(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 14984284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. From workplace to home environment: spreading of mouse allergens by laboratory animal workers.
    Kube H; Herrera R; Dietrich-Gümperlein G; Schierl R; Nowak D; Radon K; Wengenroth L; Gerlich J
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2021 May; 94(4):601-610. PubMed ID: 33219477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Occupational mouse allergen exposure among non-mouse handlers.
    Curtin-Brosnan J; Paigen B; Hagberg KA; Langley S; O'Neil EA; Krevans M; Eggleston PA; Matsui EC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Dec; 7(12):726-34. PubMed ID: 21058157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A new amplified monoclonal rat allergen assay used for evaluation of ventilation improvements in animal rooms.
    Renström A; Larsson PH; Malmberg P; Bayard C
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1997 Nov; 100(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 9389295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. An evaluation of intra-cage ventilation in three animal caging systems.
    Keller LS; White WJ; Snider MT; Lang CM
    Lab Anim Sci; 1989 May; 39(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 2724925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The effects of cage design on airborne allergens and endotoxin in animal rooms: high-volume measurements with an ion-charging device.
    Platts-Mills J; Custis N; Kenney A; Tsay A; Chapman M; Feldman S; Platts-Mills T
    Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 44(2):12-6. PubMed ID: 15773770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Exposure of laboratory animal care workers to airborne mouse and rat allergens.
    Glueck JT; Huneke RB; Perez H; Burstyn I
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2012; 51(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 23312083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A positive, individually ventilated caging system: a local barrier system to protect both animals and personnel.
    Clough G; Wallace J; Gamble MR; Merryweather ER; Bailey E
    Lab Anim; 1995 Apr; 29(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 7603000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Occupational challenge studies with laboratory workers allergic to rats.
    Eggleston PA; Ansari AA; Ziemann B; Adkinson NF; Corn M
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1990 Jul; 86(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 2196304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Distribution of airborne mouse allergen in a major mouse breeding facility.
    Ohman JL; Hagberg K; MacDonald MR; Jones RR; Paigen BJ; Kacergis JB
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1994 Nov; 94(5):810-7. PubMed ID: 7963149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The effect of relative humidity on mouse allergen levels in an environmentally controlled mouse room.
    Jones RB; Kacergis JB; MacDonald MR; McKnight FT; Turner WA; Ohman JL; Paigen B
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1995 Apr; 56(4):398-401. PubMed ID: 7726106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Variation in rat urinary aeroallergen levels explained by differences in site, task and exposure group.
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Gordon S; Harris JM; Tee RD; Venables KM; Newman Taylor AJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1995 Dec; 39(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 8588715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Allergy to laboratory animals. A new problem of the occupational environment].
    Hunskår S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 Aug; 109(24):2453-5. PubMed ID: 2814962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Immunochemical measurement of airborne mouse allergens in a laboratory animal facility.
    Twiggs JT; Agarwal MK; Dahlberg MJ; Yunginger JW
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1982 Jun; 69(6):522-6. PubMed ID: 7076993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Exposure-response relations among laboratory animal workers exposed to rats.
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Putcha V; Gordon S; Heederik D; Venables KM; Cullinan P; Newman-Taylor AJ
    Occup Environ Med; 2003 Feb; 60(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 12554837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Airborne dust and aeroallergen concentration in a horse stable under two different management systems.
    Woods PS; Robinson NE; Swanson MC; Reed CE; Broadstone RV; Derksen FJ
    Equine Vet J; 1993 May; 25(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 8508749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Monitoring exposure of personnel to volatile nitrosamines in the laboratory environment.
    Issenberg P; Swanson SE
    IARC Sci Publ; 1980; (31):531-40. PubMed ID: 7228277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Sampling for airborne fluorouracil in a hospital drug preparation area.
    McDiarmid MA; Egan T; Furio M; Bonacci M; Watts SR
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Aug; 43(8):1942-5. PubMed ID: 3752134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Laboratory animal allergens.
    Wood RA
    ILAR J; 2001; 42(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11123185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.