These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9249817)

  • 1. Pitfalls in diagnostic cervicovaginal cytology.
    Sidawy MK; Solomon D
    Monogr Pathol; 1997; (39):1-15. PubMed ID: 9249817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions. III. Pitfalls in diagnosis.
    Pacey F; Ayer B; Greenberg M
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 3376699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri.
    Krumins I; Young Q; Pacey F; Bousfield L; Mulhearn L
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(2):320-9. PubMed ID: 266347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions. II. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma.
    Ayer B; Pacey F; Greenberg M
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 3376698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cytologic, histologic and cytophometric findings in an adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix].
    Sachs H; Würthner K
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1972 Oct; 32(10):846-9. PubMed ID: 4652280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervicovaginal cytology in an indigent population. Comparison of results for 1964, 1981 and 1989.
    Costa MJ; Grimes C; Tackett E; Naib ZM
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 1994635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Histological and colposcopic surveillance of cases cytologically diagnosed as probable intraeptihelial II neoplasia].
    Brañes J; Martínez L; Wild R; Márquez J
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1977; 42(2):75-6. PubMed ID: 613388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blinded review of papanicolaou smears.
    Frable WJ
    Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 15211470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Litigation cells" in the Papanicolaou smear: extramural review of smears by "experts".
    Frable WJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 9111121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Despite potential flaws, the false-negative proportion remains the best practical measure of the accuracy of cervical cytology screening.
    Krieger P; Naryshkin S
    Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 9349511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
    Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
    Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
    Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. False negative cervical cytology.
    Evans H
    Pa Med; 1989 Mar; 92(3):62-3. PubMed ID: 2927953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology.
    Davis JR; Hindman WM; Paplanus SH; Trego DC; Wiens JL; Suciu TN
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 6945018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosis of vaginal carcinoma from cytologic material.
    Merchant S; Murad TM; Dowling EA; Durant J
    Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 4531803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the EA-rosette test in the early detection of cervical cancer.
    Wagner D; Noltenius HW
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 6576540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the problem of definition of errors and false-negative smears.
    Davey DD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 9111115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Diagnostic value of suspicious and positive cervix smears].
    Voss J; Schubel HW; Kruschwitz S
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1974 Feb; 96(6):173-7. PubMed ID: 4825924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Critical observations on the rate of "False Negative" findings in gynecologic cytology (author's transl)].
    Bayrle W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Oct; 37(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 924093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Atypical or suspicious cervical smears. An aggressive diagnostic approach.
    Nyirjesy I
    JAMA; 1972 Nov; 222(6):691-3. PubMed ID: 4677898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.