211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9249817)
1. Pitfalls in diagnostic cervicovaginal cytology.
Sidawy MK; Solomon D
Monogr Pathol; 1997; (39):1-15. PubMed ID: 9249817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions. III. Pitfalls in diagnosis.
Pacey F; Ayer B; Greenberg M
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 3376699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri.
Krumins I; Young Q; Pacey F; Bousfield L; Mulhearn L
Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(2):320-9. PubMed ID: 266347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri and related lesions. II. Microinvasive adenocarcinoma.
Ayer B; Pacey F; Greenberg M
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 3376698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cytologic, histologic and cytophometric findings in an adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix].
Sachs H; Würthner K
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1972 Oct; 32(10):846-9. PubMed ID: 4652280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervicovaginal cytology in an indigent population. Comparison of results for 1964, 1981 and 1989.
Costa MJ; Grimes C; Tackett E; Naib ZM
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 1994635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Histological and colposcopic surveillance of cases cytologically diagnosed as probable intraeptihelial II neoplasia].
Brañes J; Martínez L; Wild R; Márquez J
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1977; 42(2):75-6. PubMed ID: 613388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Blinded review of papanicolaou smears.
Frable WJ
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 102(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 15211470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Litigation cells" in the Papanicolaou smear: extramural review of smears by "experts".
Frable WJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 9111121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Despite potential flaws, the false-negative proportion remains the best practical measure of the accuracy of cervical cytology screening.
Krieger P; Naryshkin S
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 9349511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. False negative cervical cytology.
Evans H
Pa Med; 1989 Mar; 92(3):62-3. PubMed ID: 2927953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of duplicate smears in cervical cytology.
Davis JR; Hindman WM; Paplanus SH; Trego DC; Wiens JL; Suciu TN
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 6945018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosis of vaginal carcinoma from cytologic material.
Merchant S; Murad TM; Dowling EA; Durant J
Acta Cytol; 1974; 18(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 4531803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of the EA-rosette test in the early detection of cervical cancer.
Wagner D; Noltenius HW
Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 6576540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: the problem of definition of errors and false-negative smears.
Davey DD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 9111115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnostic value of suspicious and positive cervix smears].
Voss J; Schubel HW; Kruschwitz S
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1974 Feb; 96(6):173-7. PubMed ID: 4825924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Critical observations on the rate of "False Negative" findings in gynecologic cytology (author's transl)].
Bayrle W
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Oct; 37(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 924093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Atypical or suspicious cervical smears. An aggressive diagnostic approach.
Nyirjesy I
JAMA; 1972 Nov; 222(6):691-3. PubMed ID: 4677898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
