BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9249923)

  • 1. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
    Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
    Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
    Hajian-Tilaki KO; Hanley JA; Joseph L; Collet JP
    Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 8994156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size determination for comparing accuracies between two diagnostic tests under a paired design.
    Hwang YT; Su NC
    Biom J; 2022 Apr; 64(4):771-804. PubMed ID: 35429054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computing sample size for receiver operating characteristic studies.
    Obuchowski NA
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb; 29(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 8169102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
    Obuchowski NA
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
    Song HH
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Partial Youden index and its inferences.
    Li C; Chen J; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 30359546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves.
    Du P; Tang L
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 18985706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination.
    Subtil F; Rabilloud M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):752-9. PubMed ID: 25660050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
    Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests.
    Jiang Y; Metz CE; Nishikawa RM
    Radiology; 1996 Dec; 201(3):745-50. PubMed ID: 8939225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limitations to the robustness of binormal ROC curves: effects of model misspecification and location of decision thresholds on bias, precision, size and power.
    Walsh SJ
    Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 9131755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
    Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.