These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests. Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size. Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape. Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The partial area under the summary ROC curve. Walter SD Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests. Hajian-Tilaki KO; Hanley JA; Joseph L; Collet JP Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 8994156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests. Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sample size determination for comparing accuracies between two diagnostic tests under a paired design. Hwang YT; Su NC Biom J; 2022 Apr; 64(4):771-804. PubMed ID: 35429054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard. Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Obuchowski NA Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing. Song HH Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Partial Youden index and its inferences. Li C; Chen J; Qin G J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 30359546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves. Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves. Du P; Tang L Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 18985706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination. Subtil F; Rabilloud M J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):752-9. PubMed ID: 25660050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test. Yu W; Park E; Chang YC J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. Jiang Y; Metz CE; Nishikawa RM Radiology; 1996 Dec; 201(3):745-50. PubMed ID: 8939225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limitations to the robustness of binormal ROC curves: effects of model misspecification and location of decision thresholds on bias, precision, size and power. Walsh SJ Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 9131755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves. Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]