67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9250300)
1. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Stratification of the risk of association with, or progression to, squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization.
Sheils LA; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1065-72. PubMed ID: 9250300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histology correlation with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology diagnoses: An argument to ensure ASCUS follow-up that is as aggressive as that for LSIL.
Dvorak KA; Finnemore M; Maksem JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 10495326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ASCUS, mature metaplastic type. Cytologic diagnosis and follow-up.
Gupta D; Kannan V; Komaromy-Hiller G; Kline TS
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11284305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance qualified: a follow-up study.
Kline MJ; Davey DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 8725142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnosis and survey of abnormal/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.
Giudice A; Rizzo M; Rossi RT; Bonaffini O; Buda CA; Pettineo G
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1195-9. PubMed ID: 10810421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in women over 55. Comparison with the general population and implications for management.
Rader AE; Rose PG; Rodriguez M; Mansbacher S; Pitlik D; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 10349362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postmenopausal squamous-cell atypias: a diagnostic challenge.
Saminathan T; Lahoti C; Kannan V; Kline TS
Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 7867464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atypical epithelial cells and specimen adequacy: current laboratory practices of participants in the college of American pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology.
Davey DD; Woodhouse S; Styer P; Stastny J; Mody D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2000 Feb; 124(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 10656727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ASCUS: comparative follow-up results related to previous SIL diagnosis.
Alameda F; Fuste P; Conangla M; Gimferrer E; Soler I; Antorn MT; Persico S; Carreras R; Serrano S
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 10726627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) be subcategorized? Accuracy analysis of Papanicolaou smears using receiver operating characteristic curves and implications for the ASCUS/squamous intraepithelial lesion ratio.
Renshaw AA; Genest DR; Cibas ES
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Nov; 116(5):692-5. PubMed ID: 11710685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rare atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): a clinically significant diagnosis?
Hoerl HD; Roth-Cline MD; Shalkham JE; Pfister J; Stewart J; Guo Z; De Las Casas LE; Caya JG; Kurtycz DF
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jul; 27(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 12112807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Current laboratory practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory. Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Davey DD; Nielsen ML; Naryshkin S; Robb JA; Cohen T; Kline TS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 May; 120(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 8639046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases.
Auger M; Charbonneau M; Arseneau J
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 9390122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atypical reparative change on cervical/vaginal smears may be associated with dysplasia.
Rimm DL; Gmitro S; Frable WJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 8725141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Degree of dysplasia following diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance is influenced by patient history and type of follow-up.
Ghoussoub RA; Rimm DL
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Jul; 17(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 9218897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
