85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9250505)
1. Divergent selection for heat loss in mice: I. Selection applied and direct response through fifteen generations.
Nielsen MK; Jones LD; Freking BA; DeShazer JA
J Anim Sci; 1997 Jun; 75(6):1461-8. PubMed ID: 9250505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Divergent selection for heat loss in mice: II. Correlated responses in feed intake, body mass, body composition, and number born through fifteen generations.
Nielsen MK; Freking BA; Jones LD; Nelson SM; Vorderstrasse TL; Hussey BA
J Anim Sci; 1997 Jun; 75(6):1469-76. PubMed ID: 9250506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Renewed selection for heat loss in mice: direct responses and correlated responses in feed intake, body weight, litter size, and conception rate.
McDonald JM; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2007 Mar; 85(3):658-66. PubMed ID: 17060417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlated responses in maternal performance following divergent selection for heat loss in mice.
McDonald JM; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2006 Feb; 84(2):300-4. PubMed ID: 16424256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in mitochondrial efficiency between lines of mice divergently selected for heat loss.
McDonald JM; Ramsey JJ; Miner JL; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3105-13. PubMed ID: 19542504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of feed energy costs of maintenance, lean deposition, and fat deposition in three lines of mice selected for heat loss.
Eggert DL; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2006 Feb; 84(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 16424253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Locomotor activity, core body temperature, and circadian rhythms in mice selected for high or low heat loss.
Mousel MR; Stroup WW; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2001 Apr; 79(4):861-8. PubMed ID: 11325190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Life cycle biological efficiency of mice divergently selected for heat loss.
Bhatnagar AS; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3237-48. PubMed ID: 24902598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hepatic mitochondrial efficiency in lines of mice differing in feed intake.
Murphy TW; McDonald JM; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2013 May; 91(5):2077-82. PubMed ID: 23463560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Body composition and feed intake of reproducing and growing mice divergently selected for heat loss.
Bhatnagar AS; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2014 May; 92(5):1886-94. PubMed ID: 24663174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Locomotor activity and body temperature in selected mouse lines differing greatly in feed intake.
Sojka PA; Griess RS; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3557-63. PubMed ID: 23739793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lifetime reproductive performance and survival analysis of mice divergently selected for heat loss.
Bhatnagar AS; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2014 Feb; 92(2):477-84. PubMed ID: 24664557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of mouse lines divergently selected for heat loss when exposed to different environmental temperatures. I. Reproductive performance, pup survival, and metabolic hormones.
Kgwatalala PM; DeRoin JL; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2004 Oct; 82(10):2876-83. PubMed ID: 15484937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of mouse lines divergently selected for heat loss when exposed to different environmental temperatures. II. Feed intake, growth, fatness, and body organs.
Kgwatalala PM; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 2004 Oct; 82(10):2884-91. PubMed ID: 15484938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results from nine generations of selection for increased litter size in swine.
Holl JW; Robison OW
J Anim Sci; 2003 Mar; 81(3):624-9. PubMed ID: 12661642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alternative methods of selection for litter size in mice: II. Response to thirteen generations of selection.
Gion JM; Clutter AC; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 1990 Nov; 68(11):3543-56. PubMed ID: 2262407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gene expression in hypothalamus and brown adipose tissue of mice divergently selected for heat loss.
Allan MF; Nielsen MK; Pomp D
Physiol Genomics; 2000 Sep; 3(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 11015610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative methods of selection for litter size in mice: III. Response to 21 generations of selection.
Kirby YK; Nielsen MK
J Anim Sci; 1993 Mar; 71(3):571-8. PubMed ID: 8463142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Synchronous direct gradient layer and indirect room calorimetry.
Seale JL; Rumpler WV
J Appl Physiol (1985); 1997 Nov; 83(5):1775-81. PubMed ID: 9375351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct responses to selection for increased litter size, decreased age at puberty, or random selection following selection for ovulation rate in swine.
Lamberson WR; Johnson RK; Zimmerman DR; Long TE
J Anim Sci; 1991 Aug; 69(8):3129-43. PubMed ID: 1894548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
