16 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9250515)
1. Application of exogenous enzymes to beef muscle of high and low-connective tissue.
Sullivan GA; Calkins CR
Meat Sci; 2010 Aug; 85(4):730-4. PubMed ID: 20416788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Muscle transcriptomic analyses in Angus cattle with divergent tenderness.
Zhao C; Tian F; Yu Y; Luo J; Hu Q; Bequette BJ; Baldwin Vi RL; Liu G; Zan L; Scott Updike M; Song J
Mol Biol Rep; 2012 Apr; 39(4):4185-93. PubMed ID: 21901422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Tendertec beef grading instrument to predict the tenderness of steaks from beef carcasses.
Belk KE; George MH; Tatum JD; Hilton GG; Miller RK; Koohmaraie M; Reagan JO; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 2001 Mar; 79(3):688-97. PubMed ID: 11263829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benchmarking carcass characteristics and muscles from commercially identified beef and dairy cull cow carcasses for Warner-Bratzler shear force and sensory attributes.
Stelzleni AM; Patten LE; Johnson DD; Calkins CR; Gwartney BL
J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2631-8. PubMed ID: 17565055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of USDA instrument-based marbling measurements for categorizing beef carcasses according to differences in longissimus muscle sensory attributes.
Emerson MR; Woerner DR; Belk KE; Tatum JD
J Anim Sci; 2013 Feb; 91(2):1024-34. PubMed ID: 23148250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beef customer satisfaction: trained sensory panel ratings and Warner-Bratzler shear force values.
Lorenzen CL; Miller RK; Taylors JF; Neely TR; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Buyek MJ; Reagan JO; Savell JW
J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 12597384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical measures of uncooked beef longissimus muscle can predict sensory panel tenderness and Warner-Bratzler shear force of cooked steaks.
Timm RR; Unruh JA; Dikeman ME; Hunt MC; Lawrence TE; Boyer JE; Marsden JL
J Anim Sci; 2003 Jul; 81(7):1721-7. PubMed ID: 12854808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of USDA quality grade with tendertec for the assessment of beef palatability.
George MH; Tatum JD; Dolezal HG; Morgan JB; Wise JW; Calkins CR; Gordon T; Reagan JO; Smith GC
J Anim Sci; 1997 Jun; 75(6):1538-46. PubMed ID: 9250515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
