These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9251141)

  • 1. Maximizing yield.
    Pollock DL
    Poult Sci; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1131-3. PubMed ID: 9251141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Poultry breeding in the post-genomics era.
    Bulfield G
    Br Poult Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 15115194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef.
    Pimentel EC; König S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3418-26. PubMed ID: 22665643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Breeding strategies to increase fitness in poultry].
    Thiele HH
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2001 Mar; 108(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 11314472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic parameters for measures of energetic efficiency of bulls and their relationships with carcass traits of field progeny in Japanese Black cattle.
    Hoque MA; Hosono M; Oikawa T; Suzuki K
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 18765855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlative responses for carcass and meat quality traits to selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.
    Rosendo A; Druet T; Péry C; Bidanel JP
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):903-11. PubMed ID: 19966169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits in commercial crossbred pigs.
    Miar Y; Plastow GS; Moore SS; Manafiazar G; Charagu P; Kemp RA; Van Haandel B; Huisman AE; Zhang CY; McKay RM; Bruce HL; Wang Z
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):2869-84. PubMed ID: 24778330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of selection for ultrasound intramuscular fat percentage in Angus bulls on carcass traits of progeny.
    Sapp RL; Bertrand JK; Pringle TD; Wilson DE
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Aug; 80(8):2017-22. PubMed ID: 12211367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Commercial approaches to genetic selection for growth and feed conversion in domestic poultry.
    Emmerson DA
    Poult Sci; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 9251138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intramuscular fat in lamb muscle and the impact of selection for improved carcass lean meat yield.
    Anderson F; Pannier L; Pethick DW; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2015 Jun; 9(6):1081-90. PubMed ID: 25510326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integration of classical and molecular approaches of genetic selection: egg production.
    Emsley A
    Poult Sci; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1127-30. PubMed ID: 9251140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle.
    Nkrumah JD; Basarab JA; Wang Z; Li C; Price MA; Okine EK; Crews DH; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2711-20. PubMed ID: 17526662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic parameters for carcass composition and pork quality estimated in a commercial production chain.
    van Wijk HJ; Arts DJ; Matthews JO; Webster M; Ducro BJ; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Feb; 83(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 15644503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Climate change and heat stress: Impact on production, reproduction and growth performance of poultry and its mitigation using genetic strategies.
    Kumar M; Ratwan P; Dahiya SP; Nehra AK
    J Therm Biol; 2021 Apr; 97():102867. PubMed ID: 33863431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Duroc- vs. Pietrain-sired pigs for carcass and meat quality measures.
    Edwards DB; Bates RO; Osburn WN
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):1895-9. PubMed ID: 12926770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Animal breeding strategies can improve meat quality attributes within entire populations.
    Berry DP; Conroy S; Pabiou T; Cromie AR
    Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():6-18. PubMed ID: 28515004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Yield and quality grade outcomes as affected by molecular breeding values for commercial beef cattle.
    Thompson NM; DeVuyst EA; Brorsen BW; Lusk JL
    J Anim Sci; 2015 May; 93(5):2045-55. PubMed ID: 26020300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The application of gene marker-assisted selection and proteomics for the best meat quality criteria and body measurements in Qinchuan cattle breed.
    Abd El-Hack ME; Abdelnour SA; Swelum AA; Arif M
    Mol Biol Rep; 2018 Oct; 45(5):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 30006771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic correlations between ewe reproduction and carcass and meat quality traits in Merino sheep.
    Safari E; Fogarty NM; Hopkins DL; Greeff JC; Brien FD; Atkins KD; Mortimer SI; Taylor PJ; van der Werf JH
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Dec; 125(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 19134075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.