These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9251741)

  • 21. Noise robustness of a colorimetric evaluation model for image acquisition devices with different characterization models.
    Hironaga M; Shimano N
    Appl Opt; 2009 Oct; 48(28):5354-62. PubMed ID: 19798375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images.
    Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Buhr E; Illers H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 15933084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Proportionality between Wiener spectra of quantum mottle and the squares of modulation transfer functions.
    Arimura H; Kubota H; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 May; 44(5):1337-52. PubMed ID: 10368023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum.
    Giger ML; Doi K; Metz CE
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):797-805. PubMed ID: 6513887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relation between radiographic mottle for double and single emulsions.
    Arimura H; Okawa T; Okamoto M; Ikari T; Nakamori N; Kubota H; Matsumoto M; Takigawa A; Kanamori H
    Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1625-35. PubMed ID: 9775367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Information yield: a comparison of Kodak T-Mat G, Ortho L and RP X-Omat films.
    Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Peterson MG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2599233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
    Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation and testing of computed radiography systems.
    Charnock P; Connolly PA; Hughes D; Moores BM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):201-7. PubMed ID: 15933109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Noise power spectrum analysis of a scanning microdensitometer.
    Bunch PC; Van Metter R
    Appl Opt; 1988 Aug; 27(16):3468-74. PubMed ID: 20539401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of screen/film combinations on diagnostic certainty: Hi-Plus/RPL versus Lanex/Ortho G in excretory urography.
    Thornbury JR; Fryback DG; Patterson FE; Chiavarini RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 413423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Wiener noise power spectra of radiological television systems using a digital oscilloscope.
    Rowlands JA; DeCrescenzo G
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 2308547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurement of the spatial Wiener spectrum of nonstorage imaging devices.
    Drangova M; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 3386583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new method for microdensitometer slit length correction of radiographic noise power spectra.
    Koedooder K; Strackee J; Venema HW
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 3736504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of two methods for accurate measurement of modulation transfer functions of screen-film systems.
    Morishita J; Doi K; Bollen R; Bunch PC; Hoeschen D; Sirand-rey G; Sukenobu Y
    Med Phys; 1995 Feb; 22(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 7565350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of microdensitometer scan slit misalignment in MTF determinations.
    Villafana T
    Med Phys; 1975; 2(5):255-8. PubMed ID: 1186631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. WE-G-BRA-02: Visual Demonstrations of Medical Physics Concepts of Transmission Imaging for Resident Education.
    Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part28):3969. PubMed ID: 28519615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.