These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9252174)

  • 1. Backing for anti-cloning bill reopens embryo debate.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6642):505. PubMed ID: 9252174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cloning for research 'should be allowed'.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Jul; 388(6637):6. PubMed ID: 9214486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US biologists adopt cloning moratorium.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Sep; 389(6649):319. PubMed ID: 9311762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US panel to back longer cloning ban, ducks thornier questions.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 May; 387(6630):217-8. PubMed ID: 9153375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. White House bill would ban human cloning.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6634):644. PubMed ID: 9192876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Republicans seek to widen cloning ban.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):748. PubMed ID: 9194546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US bioethicists say continue human cloning moratorium.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):609. PubMed ID: 9219252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calls for cloning ban sell science short.
    Butler D; Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Mar; 386(6620):8-9. PubMed ID: 9052770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Politicians accused of 'shooting from the hip' on human cloning.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Mar; 386(6621):97-8. PubMed ID: 9062170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breakthrough stirs US embryo debate..
    Butler D
    Nature; 1998 Nov; 396(6707):104. PubMed ID: 9823879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. European ethics advisers back cloning ban.
    Butler D
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6633):536. PubMed ID: 9177326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The bioethics agenda and the Bush second term.
    Cohen E
    New Atlantis; 2004 Fall-2005 Winter; 7():11-8. PubMed ID: 15812948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panel weighs a law against cloning.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 May; 276(5316):1185-6. PubMed ID: 9182324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinton's cloning ban may threaten genetic research.
    Hoyle R
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Jul; 15(7):600. PubMed ID: 9219249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Washington Insider: Congressional impasse on human cloning.
    Doerflinger RM
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15192847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cloning, by whatever name, smells bad.
    Kavanaugh JF
    America (NY); 2006 Jun 19-26; 194(21):9. PubMed ID: 16856300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US senators urge caution on cloning ban.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1997 Mar; 386(6622):204. PubMed ID: 9069271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cloning human beings. Responding to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission's Report.
    Blacksher E
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):6-9. PubMed ID: 9383657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Doing things with embryos.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(1):5. PubMed ID: 7730056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attack of the anti-cloners: what the government should do.
    Caplan A
    Free Inq; 2002-2003 Winter; 23(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 16208833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.