BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9253258)

  • 1. Misconduct in research: editors respond.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):201-2. PubMed ID: 9253258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
    Farthing MJ
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. British editors form misconduct panel.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editors call for misconduct watchdog.
    Williams N
    Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editors seek ways to cope with fraud.
    Williams N
    Science; 1997 Nov; 278(5341):1221. PubMed ID: 9411745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Will the UK cope?
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): Objectives and achievements 1997-2012.
    Wager E
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):861-6. PubMed ID: 22727914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Call for research misconduct agency.
    White C
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter.
    Goldbeck-Wood S
    BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):7-8. PubMed ID: 10406357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
    Farthing MJ
    Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
    Hilgartner S
    IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preventing Publication of Falsified and Fabricated Data: Roles of Scientists, Editors, Reviewers, and Readers.
    Korte SM; van der Heyden MA
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2017 Feb; 69(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 27851697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific misconduct in environmental science and toxicology.
    Nigg HN; Radulescu G
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):168-70. PubMed ID: 8015136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical issues in medical publishing.
    Riis P
    Br J Urol; 1995 Nov; 76 Suppl 2():1-4. PubMed ID: 8535747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misconduct in research. Misconduct is not reported in biomedical journals in France.
    Maisonneuve H
    BMJ; 1996 Jul; 313(7049):109. PubMed ID: 8688718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct.
    Chalmers I
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1405-8. PubMed ID: 2304220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors.
    Yankauer A
    Am J Public Health; 1990 Apr; 80(4):399-400. PubMed ID: 2316756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The editor and the IRB: should journals notify IRBs about possibly unethical research with human subjects?
    Szidon JP; Swazey JP
    IRB; 1986; 8(5):10-2. PubMed ID: 11653766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.