125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9253271)
1. Comparison of two methods of screening for genital chlamydial infection in women attending in general practice: cross sectional survey.
Grun L; Tassano-Smith J; Carder C; Johnson AM; Robinson A; Murray E; Stephenson J; Haines A; Copas A; Ridgway G
BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):226-30. PubMed ID: 9253271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Community-based urine screening for Chlamydia trachomatis with a ligase chain reaction assay.
Marrazzo JM; White CL; Krekeler B; Celum CL; Lafferty WE; Stamm WE; Handsfield HH
Ann Intern Med; 1997 Nov; 127(9):796-803. PubMed ID: 9382400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of genitourinary tract Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnant women by ligase chain reaction assay.
Andrews WW; Lee HH; Roden WJ; Mott CW
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 9083312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young men in north west London.
Pierpoint T; Thomas B; Judd A; Brugha R; Taylor-Robinson D; Renton A
Sex Transm Infect; 2000 Aug; 76(4):273-6. PubMed ID: 11026882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female military recruits.
Gaydos CA; Howell MR; Pare B; Clark KL; Ellis DA; Hendrix RM; Gaydos JC; McKee KT; Quinn TC
N Engl J Med; 1998 Sep; 339(11):739-44. PubMed ID: 9731090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chlamydia trachomatis detection in cervical PreservCyt specimens from an Irish urban female population.
Keegan H; Ryan F; Malkin A; Griffin M; Lambkin H
Cytopathology; 2009 Apr; 20(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 18093220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urine specimens from women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic: implications for screening strategies.
Thomas BJ; Pierpoint T; Taylor-Robinson D; Renton AM
Int J STD AIDS; 1998 Aug; 9(8):448-51. PubMed ID: 9702592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.
Macleod J; Salisbury C; Low N; McCarthy A; Sterne JA; Holloway A; Patel R; Sanford E; Morcom A; Horner P; Davey Smith G; Skidmore S; Herring A; Caul O; Hobbs FD; Egger M
BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7497):940. PubMed ID: 15809231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence and sexual behaviour among female adolescents in Belgium.
Vuylsteke B; Vandenbruaene M; Vandenbalcke P; Van Dyck E; Laga M
Sex Transm Infect; 1999 Jun; 75(3):152-5. PubMed ID: 10448391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chlamydia trachomatis screening in urine among asymptomatic men attending an STI clinic in Paris: a cross-sectional study.
Rondeau P; Valin N; Decré D; Girard PM; Lacombe K; Surgers L
BMC Infect Dis; 2019 Jan; 19(1):31. PubMed ID: 30621621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in nonurban family planning clinics in Wisconsin.
Addiss DG; Vaughn ML; Holzhueter MA; Bakken LL; Davis JP
Fam Plann Perspect; 1987; 19(6):252-6. PubMed ID: 3436412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective screening for chlamydial infection: which criteria to use?
Miller WC; Hoffman IF; Owen-O'Dowd J; McPherson JT; Privette A; Schmitz JL; Woodlief G; Leone PA
Am J Prev Med; 2000 Feb; 18(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 10698241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in adolescent females not having pelvic examinations: utility of PCR-based urine screening in urban adolescent clinic setting.
Oh MK; Richey CM; Pate MS; Brown PR; Hook EW
J Adolesc Health; 1997 Aug; 21(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 9248931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Criteria for selective screening of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending private gynecology practices.
Warszawski J; Meyer L; Weber P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1999 Sep; 86(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 10471135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for genital chlamydia infection: DNA amplification techniques should be the test of choice.
Harindra V; Underhill G; Tobin JM
Int J STD AIDS; 2003 Nov; 14(11):723-6. PubMed ID: 14624732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Opportunistic screening for chlamydia infection in general practice: can we reach young women?
Santer M; Warner P; Wyke S; Sutherland S
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):175-6. PubMed ID: 11202582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Urine based screening for asymptomatic/undiagnosed genital chlamydial infection in young people visiting the accident and emergency department is feasible, acceptable, and can be epidemiologically helpful.
Aldeen T; Haghdoost A; Hay P
Sex Transm Infect; 2003 Jun; 79(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 12794209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening voided urine for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic adolescent females.
Svensson LO; Mares I; Mårdh PA; Olsson SE
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Jan; 73(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8304030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Systematic home screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections of asymptomatic men and women in family practice by means of mail-in urine samples].
van Valkengoed IG; Boeke AJ; van den Brule AJ; Morré SA; Dekker JH; Meijer CJ; van Eijk JT
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):672-6. PubMed ID: 10321300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
Ridgway GL; Mumtaz G; Robinson AJ; Franchini M; Carder C; Burczak J; Lee H
J Clin Pathol; 1996 Feb; 49(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 8655675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
