These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9254891)

  • 1. The first US National Toxicology Program exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: definitive results.
    Benigni R
    Mutat Res; 1997 Aug; 387(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 9254891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity of further 30 chemicals bioassayed by the U.S. National Toxicology Program.
    Benigni R; Andreoli C; Zito R
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Oct; 104 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1041-4. PubMed ID: 8933052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The second National Toxicology Program comparative exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: definitive results.
    Benigni R; Zito R
    Mutat Res; 2004 Jan; 566(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 14706511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QSAR prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for a set of chemicals currently bioassayed by the US National Toxicology Program.
    Benigni R
    Mutagenesis; 1991 Sep; 6(5):423-5. PubMed ID: 1795649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents: the state of the art in light of a comparative exercise.
    Benigni R
    Mutat Res; 1995 Feb; 334(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 7528333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.
    Lagunin AA; Dearden JC; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
    Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 586(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16112600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for 44 chemicals: results.
    Ashby J; Tennant RW
    Mutagenesis; 1994 Jan; 9(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 8208133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristic substructures and properties in chemical carcinogens studied by the cascade model.
    Okada T
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(10):1208-15. PubMed ID: 12835263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge 2000-2001.
    Helma C; Kramer S
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(10):1179-82. PubMed ID: 12835259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity using the DEREK system for 30 chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program. The DEREK Collaborative Group.
    Marchant CA
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Oct; 104 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1065-73. PubMed ID: 8933056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Putting the Predictive Toxicology Challenge into perspective: reflections on the results.
    Benigni R; Giuliani A
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(10):1194-200. PubMed ID: 12835261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of the carcinogenicity in rodents of chemicals currently being tested by the US National Toxicology Program: structure-activity correlations.
    Rosenkranz HS; Klopman G
    Mutagenesis; 1990 Sep; 5(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 2263200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How well can in vitro data predict in vivo effects of chemicals? Rodent carcinogenicity as a case study.
    Anthony Tony Cox L; Popken DA; Kaplan AM; Plunkett LM; Becker RA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():54-64. PubMed ID: 26879462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing computational toxicology models with phytochemicals.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Busta E; Minnier BL; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2010 Feb; 54(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 20024931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP.
    Ashby J; Tennant RW
    Mutat Res; 1991 May; 257(3):229-306. PubMed ID: 1707500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of the rodent carcinogenicity of organic compounds from their chemical structures using the FALS method.
    Moriguchi I; Hirano H; Hirono S
    Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Oct; 104 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 8933054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Further evaluation of COMPACT, the molecular orbital approach for the prospective safety evaluation of chemicals.
    Lewis DF; Ioannides C; Parke DV
    Mutat Res; 1998 Jan; 412(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 9508363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.