138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9254987)
1. Computational aspects of finite element modeling in EEG source localization.
Awada KA; Jackson DR; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Baumann SB; Papanicolaou AC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Aug; 44(8):736-52. PubMed ID: 9254987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A full subtraction approach for finite element method based source analysis using constrained Delaunay tetrahedralisation.
Drechsler F; Wolters CH; Dierkes T; Si H; Grasedyck L
Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 19264145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The forward EEG solutions can be computed using artificial neural networks.
Sun M; Sclabassi RJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Aug; 47(8):1044-50. PubMed ID: 10943052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Representation of bioelectric current sources using Whitney elements in the finite element method.
Tanzer IO; Järvenpää S; Nenonen J; Somersalo E
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3023-39. PubMed ID: 15972978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geometry-adapted hexahedral meshes improve accuracy of finite-element-method-based EEG source analysis.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Berti G; Hartmann U
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Aug; 54(8):1446-53. PubMed ID: 17694865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head.
Haueisen J; Ramon C; Eiselt M; Brauer H; Nowak H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Aug; 44(8):727-35. PubMed ID: 9254986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
Musha T; Okamoto Y
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A meshless method for solving the EEG forward problem.
von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 52(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 15709662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of two dipolar inverse algorithms applying reciprocity for forward calculation.
Laarne P; Hyttinen J; Dodel S; Malmivuo J; Eskola H
Comput Biomed Res; 2000 Jun; 33(3):172-85. PubMed ID: 10860584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A computationally efficient method for accurately solving the EEG forward problem in a finely discretized head model.
Neilson LA; Kovalyov M; Koles ZJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 116(10):2302-14. PubMed ID: 16125461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probabilistic forward model for electroencephalography source analysis.
Plis SM; George JS; Jun SC; Ranken DM; Volegov PL; Schmidt DM
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5309-27. PubMed ID: 17762088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Source localization using a current-density minimization approach.
Miga MI; Kerner TE; Darcey TM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Jul; 49(7):743-5. PubMed ID: 12083311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Modeling the effect of the layer thickness and tissue conductivities of the head and the brain on the EEG potentials using finite element method].
Stavtsev AIu; Ushakov VL; Verkhliutov VM
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2007; 57(6):742-52. PubMed ID: 18592709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dipole modeling of epileptic spikes can be accurate or misleading.
Kobayashi K; Yoshinaga H; Ohtsuka Y; Gotman J
Epilepsia; 2005 Mar; 46(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 15730537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
