1351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9255359)
1. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures using one locking plate versus two reconstruction plates: a laboratory study.
Tejwani NC; Murthy A; Park J; McLaurin TM; Egol KA; Kummer FJ
J Trauma; 2009 Mar; 66(3):795-9. PubMed ID: 19276755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical comparison of plate configuration in distal humerus fractures.
Arnander MW; Reeves A; MacLeod IA; Pinto TM; Khaleel A
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(5):332-6. PubMed ID: 18448987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
Schwartz A; Oka R; Odell T; Mahar A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):950-5. PubMed ID: 16782245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateral J-plate fixation in comminuted intercondylar fracture of the humerus.
Yang KH; Park HW; Park SJ; Jung SH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):234-8. PubMed ID: 12720014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Functional results of the parallel-plate technique for complex distal humerus fractures].
Atalar AC; Demirhan M; Salduz A; Kiliçoğlu O; Seyahi A
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2009; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 19293612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Angle-fixed plate fixation or double-plate osteosynthesis in fractures of the proximal humerus: a biomechanical study].
Hessmann MH; Korner J; Hofmann A; Sternstein W; Rommens PM
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 18601621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of methods of internal fixation of the distal humerus.
Schemitsch EH; Tencer AF; Henley MB
J Orthop Trauma; 1994 Dec; 8(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 7869160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Functional results after osteosynthesis of the distal humerus fracture with an anatomically precontoured, angular-stable double plate system].
Schmidt-Horlohé K; Bonk A; Wilde P; Becker L; Hoffmann R
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 May; 148(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 20135617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative biomechanical analysis of implants for the stabilization of proximal humerus fractures.
Füchtmeier B; May R; Fierlbeck J; Hammer J; Nerlich M
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):261-70. PubMed ID: 17065749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
Otto RJ; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough?
Hak DJ; Althausen P; Hazelwood SJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Apr; 24(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 20335752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of distal humerus fracture fixation: a biomechanical study.
Jacobson SR; Glisson RR; Urbaniak JR
J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 9434244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of three models of extra-articular distal humerus fracture osteosynthesis using the finite element method on an osteoporotic computational model.
Sabalic S; Kodvanj J; Pavic A
Injury; 2013 Sep; 44 Suppl 3():S56-61. PubMed ID: 24060021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A comparative study on open reduction and plating osteosynthesis and minimal invasive plating osteosynthesis in treating mid-distal humeral shaft fractures].
An Z; He X; Zeng B
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 23(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 19192876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proximal humerus fractures.
Lever JP; Aksenov SA; Zdero R; Ahn H; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18176161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double plate osteosynthesis provides better biomechanical stabilization than double tension band technique in distal humerus fractures.
Doğramaci Y; Esen E; Kürklü M; Kirici Y; Atahan AO; Kömürcü M
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2010 Apr; 21(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 20302560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
