These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9255431)

  • 21. Probability and inter-stimulus interval effects on the P300 from auditory stimuli.
    Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1990 Dec; 10(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 2272863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b.
    Katayama J; Polich J
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jan; 35(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 9499703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of P300 from passive and active tasks for auditory and visual stimuli.
    Bennington JY; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1999 Nov; 34(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 10576401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
    Goldstein A; Spencer KM; Donchin E
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hemispheric differences for P300 amplitude from an auditory oddball task.
    Alexander JE; Bauer LO; Kuperman S; Morzorati S; O'Connor SJ; Rohrbaugh J; Porjesz B; Begleiter H; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996; 21(2-3):189-96. PubMed ID: 8792206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparisons of P300s from standard oddball and omitted paradigms: implications to exogenous/endogenous contributions.
    McCullagh J; Weihing J; Musiek F
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Mar; 20(3):187-95; quiz 219. PubMed ID: 19927689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs.
    Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 17481761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cholinergic Mechanisms of Target Oddball Stimuli Detection: The Late "P300-Like" Event-Related Potential in Rats.
    Ahnaou A; Biermans R; Drinkenburg WHIM
    Neural Plast; 2018; 2018():4270263. PubMed ID: 30410536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The auditory P3 from passive and active three-stimulus oddball paradigm.
    Wronka E; Kaiser J; Coenen AML
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2008; 68(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 18668159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli.
    Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Jul; 68(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 2439311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects.
    Hagen GF; Gatherwright JR; Lopez BA; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 16253363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. P300 and allocation of attention in dual-tasks.
    Nash AJ; Fernandez M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996 Oct; 23(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 8947783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of response sharing and stimulus presentation frequency on event-related potentials in an auditory oddball paradigm.
    Horváth J; Roeber U; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Sep; 47(5):931-41. PubMed ID: 20230495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Heart rate and P300: Integrating peripheral and central indices of cognitive processing.
    Guerra PM; Sánchez-Adam A; Miccoli L; Polich J; Vila J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Feb; 100():1-11. PubMed ID: 26724251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm.
    Katayama J; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 100(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 8980420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minipig negative slow wave demonstrates target/nontarget differences in P300 paradigm.
    Arnfred SM; Lind NM; Moustgaard A; Hansen AK; Gjedde A
    Neuroimage; 2003 Sep; 20(1):587-90. PubMed ID: 14527619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of auditory P300 habituation from active and passive conditions.
    Polich J; McIsaac HK
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Jun; 17(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 7961051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. P300 and handedness: on the possible contribution of corpus callosal size to ERPs.
    Polich J; Hoffman LD
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Sep; 35(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 9715094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval.
    Gonsalvez CL; Polich J
    Psychophysiology; 2002 May; 39(3):388-96. PubMed ID: 12212658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.