These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9255823)

  • 1. Repeatability and accuracy of automated refraction: a comparison of the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek AR-1000, and subjective refraction.
    Elliott M; Simpson T; Richter D; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jun; 74(6):434-8. PubMed ID: 9255823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability and comparability of automated keratometry: the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek KM-800 and the Bausch and Lomb keratometer.
    Elliott M; Simpson T; Richter D; Fonn D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 May; 18(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 9829116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeatability and validity of the PowerRefractor and the Nidek AR600-A in an adult population with healthy eyes.
    Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; O'Leary DJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 80(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 12637836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
    Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system.
    Dave T; Fukuma Y
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 15181357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of an automated subjective refraction method implemented in a computer-controlled motorized phoropter.
    Otero C; Aldaba M; Pujol J
    J Optom; 2019; 12(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 30389250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated refraction. A comparative study of automated refraction with the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor and retinoscopy.
    Salvesen S; Køhler M
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1991 Jun; 69(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 1927317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeatability of subjective refraction in myopic and keratoconic subjects: results of vector analysis.
    Raasch TW; Schechtman KB; Davis LJ; Zadnik K;
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Sep; 21(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 11563425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
    Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction.
    Pesudovs K; Parker KE; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 May; 84(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17502821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multimeridional refraction: dependence of the measurement accuracy on the number of meridians refracted.
    Oechsner U; Kusel R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jun; 74(6):425-33. PubMed ID: 9255822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and OPD-scan III with the subjective refraction.
    Zhu R; Long KL; Wu XM; Li QD
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2016 Jul; 20(14):2988-92. PubMed ID: 27460724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction.
    Rosenfield M; Chiu NN
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of an automated subjective refractor.
    Sheedy J; Schanz P; Bullimore M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 15181358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
    McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 500 autorefractor and the Nidek AR-1000 autorefractor.
    Kinge B; Midelfart A; Jacobsen G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 80(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8664229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction.
    Bullimore MA; Fusaro RE; Adams CW
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Aug; 75(8):617-22. PubMed ID: 9734807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precision in automated refraction.
    Salvesen S; Køhler M
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1991 Jun; 69(3):338-41. PubMed ID: 1927316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Apr; 80(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 12692490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meridional profiles of variance-covariance of symmetric dioptric power: classes of variation that are uniform across the meridians of the eye.
    Harris WF
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jun; 74(6):397-413. PubMed ID: 9255819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.