These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9255823)

  • 21. A clinical evaluation of the Nidek Autorefractor.
    Wood IC; Papas E; Burghardt D; Hardwick G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1984; 4(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 6728478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of the HARK autorefractor in children.
    Isenberg SJ; Del Signore M; Madani-Becker G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 131(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 11292405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
    Goss DA; Grosvenor T
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of aniseikonia as measured by the aniseikonia inspector and the space eikonometer.
    Rutstein RP; Corliss DA; Fullard RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):836-42. PubMed ID: 17106411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The stenopaeic slit: an analytical expression to quantify its optical effects in front of an astigmatic eye.
    Muñoz-Escrivá L; Furlan WD
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Jul; 21(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 11430627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Virtual Subjective Refraction.
    Perches S; Collados MV; Ares J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Oct; 93(10):1243-53. PubMed ID: 27391538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intraocular lens bicylindric power calculation method: Using both flat and steep K readings to improve intraocular lens power prediction.
    Calvo-Sanz JA; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Sánchez-Tena MA
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):559-565. PubMed ID: 29566552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Autorefraction/autokeratometry and subjective refraction in untreated and photorefractive keratectomy-treated eyes.
    Oyo-Szerenyi KD; Wienecke L; Businger U; Schipper I
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1997 Feb; 115(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 9046248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
    Bennett JR; Stalboerger GM; Hodge DO; Schornack MM
    J Optom; 2015; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy and accommodation capability of a handheld autorefractor.
    Wesemann W; Dick B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Jan; 26(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 10646148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almaliki WH; AlQarni A; Osuagwu UL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):632-41. PubMed ID: 25822015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500.
    Sheppard AL; Davies LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 20444118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hand-Held Nidek versus Table-Mounted Huvitz Autorefractors and Their Agreement with Subjective Refraction in Adults.
    Sayed KM; Alsmman AH; Mostafa EM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():1391-1401. PubMed ID: 33833497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproducibility of manifest refraction between surgeons and optometrists in a clinical refractive surgery practice.
    Reinstein DZ; Yap TE; Carp GI; Archer TJ; Gobbe M;
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):450-9. PubMed ID: 24581774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Asymmetric dioptric power matrices and corresponding thick lenses.
    Keating MP
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jun; 74(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 9255818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accommodation stimulus and response determinations with autorefractors.
    Atchison DA; Varnas SR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 28030883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated refraction in aphakia--II. Its repeatability and accuracy compared to conventional techniques.
    Guillon M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 3714281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Repeatability of relative peripheral refraction in untreated and orthokeratology-treated eyes.
    Lee TT; Cho P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 89(10):1477-86. PubMed ID: 22940780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.