These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9256559)

  • 1. The therapeutic alliance in psychodynamic-interpersonal and cognitive-behavioral therapy.
    Raue PJ; Goldfried MR; Barkham M
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1997 Aug; 65(4):582-7. PubMed ID: 9256559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alliance structure assessed by the Agnew Relationship Measure (ARM).
    Agnew-Davies R; Stiles WB; Hardy GE; Barkham M; Shapiro DA
    Br J Clin Psychol; 1998 May; 37(2):155-72. PubMed ID: 9631204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working alliance, real relationship, session quality, and client improvement in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A longitudinal actor partner interdependence model.
    Kivlighan DM; Hill CE; Gelso CJ; Baumann E
    J Couns Psychol; 2016 Mar; 63(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 26689627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working through: in-session processes that promote between-session thoughts and activities.
    Owen J; Quirk K; Hilsenroth MJ; Rodolfa E
    J Couns Psychol; 2012 Jan; 59(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 21604861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mind the gap: In-session silences are associated with client attachment insecurity, therapeutic alliance, and treatment outcome.
    Daniel SIF; Folke S; Lunn S; Gondan M; Poulsen S
    Psychother Res; 2018 Mar; 28(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 27148916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction among alliance, psychodynamic-interpersonal and cognitive-behavioural techniques in the prediction of post-session change.
    Owen J; Hilsenroth MJ; Rodolfa E
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2013; 20(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 22528040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceleration of changes in session impact during contrasting time-limited psychotherapies.
    Reynolds S; Stiles WB; Barkham M; Shapiro DA
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1996 Jun; 64(3):577-86. PubMed ID: 8698952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships among client and counselor agreement about the working alliance, session evaluations, and change in client symptoms using response surface analysis.
    Marmarosh CL; Kivlighan DM
    J Couns Psychol; 2012 Jul; 59(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 22774865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative analysis of the therapeutic focus in cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal sessions.
    Goldfried MR; Castonguay LG; Hayes AM; Drozd JF; Shapiro DA
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1997 Oct; 65(5):740-8. PubMed ID: 9337493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient interpersonal impacts and the early therapeutic alliance in interpersonal therapy for depression.
    Constantino MJ; Schwaiger EM; Smith JZ; DeGeorge J; McBride C; Ravitz P; Zuroff DC
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2010 Sep; 47(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 22402097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Therapist responsiveness to client interpersonal styles during time-limited treatments for depression.
    Hardy GE; Stiles WB; Barkham M; Startup M
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1998 Apr; 66(2):304-12. PubMed ID: 9583333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relations of the alliance with psychotherapy outcome: findings in the Second Sheffield Psychotherapy Project.
    Stiles WB; Agnew-Davies R; Hardy GE; Barkham M; Shapiro DA
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1998 Oct; 66(5):791-802. PubMed ID: 9803698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression.
    Preschl B; Maercker A; Wagner B
    BMC Psychiatry; 2011 Dec; 11():189. PubMed ID: 22145768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-Therapist Perspective of the Working Alliance in Psychotherapy.
    Andrade-González N; Lahera G; Fernández-Liria A
    Psychiatr Q; 2017 Sep; 88(3):623-633. PubMed ID: 27848105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Client attachment security predicts alliance in a randomized controlled trial of two psychotherapies for bulimia nervosa.
    Folke S; Daniel SI; Poulsen S; Lunn S
    Psychother Res; 2016 Jul; 26(4):459-71. PubMed ID: 25869827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Therapists' professional and personal characteristics as predictors of working alliance in short-term and long-term psychotherapies.
    Heinonen E; Lindfors O; Härkänen T; Virtala E; Jääskeläinen T; Knekt P
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2014; 21(6):475-94. PubMed ID: 23813617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retraction of Kivlighan et al. (2016).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Oct; 70(5):463. PubMed ID: 37747526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in-session exploration of ruptures in working alliance and their associations with clients' core conflictual relationship themes, alliance-related discourse, and clients' postsession evaluations.
    Sommerfeld E; Orbach I; Zim S; Mikulincer M
    Psychother Res; 2008 Jul; 18(4):377-88. PubMed ID: 18815990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object relations assessment predicts outpatients' attrition, early working alliance and psychotherapy process.
    Vaughn KN; Jenkins SR; Weber KM
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2021 Jul; 28(4):978-987. PubMed ID: 33416195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Client and Therapist Attachment Styles and Working Alliance.
    Bucci S; Seymour-Hyde A; Harris A; Berry K
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2016; 23(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 25639686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.