These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9256708)

  • 1. 'Mouseyes': an aid to wound measurement using a computer.
    Taylor RJ
    J Wound Care; 1997 Mar; 6(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 9256708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The calculation of linear dimension and image area using a digitising tablet and personal computer.
    Taylor RJ
    Int J Clin Monit Comput; 1995 Feb; 12(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 7782664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-dimensional wound measurement: comparison of 4 techniques.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Hanson D; Olson B; Hunter S; Henly SJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7):337-43. PubMed ID: 10326350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An overview of techniques used to measure wound area and volume.
    Little C; McDonald J; Jenkins MG; McCarron P
    J Wound Care; 2009 Jun; 18(6):250-3. PubMed ID: 19661849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Verge Videometer wound measurement package.
    Williams C
    Br J Nurs; 2000 Feb 24-Mar 8; 9(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 11033643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods of measuring wound size: a comparative study.
    Plassmann P; Melhuish JM; Harding KG
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1994 Sep; 40(7):50-2, 54, 56-60. PubMed ID: 7546091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
    Foltynski P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Reliability of a Novel Mobile 3-dimensional Wound Measurement Device.
    Anghel EL; Kumar A; Bigham TE; Maselli KM; Steinberg JS; Evans KK; Kim PJ; Attinger CE
    Wounds; 2016 Nov; 28(11):379-386. PubMed ID: 27589359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wound perimeter, area, and volume measurement based on laser 3D and color acquisition.
    Pavlovčič U; Diaci J; Možina J; Jezeršek M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Apr; 14():39. PubMed ID: 25907428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histogram Planimetry Method for the Measurement of Irregular Wounds.
    Yesiloglu N; Yildiz K; Cem Akpinar A; Gorgulu T; Sirinoglu H; Ozcan A
    Wounds; 2016 Sep; 28(9):328-333. PubMed ID: 27701128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques.
    Haghpanah S; Bogie K; Wang X; Banks PG; Ho CH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1396-402. PubMed ID: 17023252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Palpebral fissure length measurement: accuracy of the FAS facial photographic analysis software and inaccuracy of the ruler.
    Astley SJ
    J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol; 2015; 22(1):e9-e26. PubMed ID: 25594840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MAVIS: a non-invasive instrument to measure area and volume of wounds. Measurement of Area and Volume Instrument System.
    Plassmann P; Jones TD
    Med Eng Phys; 1998 Jul; 20(5):332-8. PubMed ID: 9773686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mouseyes revisited: upgrading a computer program that aids wound measurement.
    Taylor RJ
    J Wound Care; 2002 Jun; 11(6):213-6. PubMed ID: 12096578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional laser imaging system for measuring wound geometry.
    Smith RB; Rogers B; Tolstykh GP; Walsh NE; Davis MG; Bunegin L; Williams RL
    Lasers Surg Med; 1998; 23(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9738543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative evaluation of the rate of myocardial interstitial fibrosis using a personal computer.
    Kitamura M; Shimizu M; Kita Y; Yoshio H; Ino H; Misawa K; Matsuyama T; Mabuchi H
    Jpn Circ J; 1997 Sep; 61(9):781-6. PubMed ID: 9293409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 2 wound volume measurement methods.
    Langemo DK; Melland H; Olson B; Hanson D; Hunter S; Henly SJ; Thompson P
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2001; 14(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 11902344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of three-dimensional wound measurements using a novel 3D-WAM camera.
    Jørgensen LB; Skov-Jeppesen SM; Halekoh U; Rasmussen BS; Sørensen JA; Jemec GBE; Yderstraede KB
    Wound Repair Regen; 2018 Nov; 26(6):456-462. PubMed ID: 30118155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of algorithms for ST measurement during exercise test.
    Petrucci E; Ghiringhelli S; Balian V; Mainardi LT; Bertinelli M
    Clin Cardiol; 1996 Mar; 19(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 8674265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.