These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9256786)

  • 1. Are nurses often sued as individual defendants? Case in point: Pastchol v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. 929 S.W.2d 713--AR (1996).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Dec; 37(7):4. PubMed ID: 9256786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stillborn released to intoxicated husband: outrage suit. Case in point: Neff v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. (799 S.W. 2d 795--AR (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Feb; 31(9):4. PubMed ID: 1852894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Heating pad PRN"--patient burned: Dr. accuses nurses. Case in point: Beckham v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. (614 So. 2d 760--LA (1993)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 May; 33(12):4. PubMed ID: 8321902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurse $20 million judgement v. insurer reversed. Case in point: Davenport v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 978 Co. (978 F. 2d 97--MS [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Jan; 33(8):2. PubMed ID: 8456171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients die in hospital fire: failure to follow protocols. Case in point: Stacy v. Truman Medical Center (836 S.W. 2d 911--MO [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Jan; 33(8):4. PubMed ID: 8456173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sponge left in pt. - Dr. settled: hospital sued for OR nurses' negligence. Savage v. Three Rivers Medical Center, C-000348-DG KYSC---S.W.3d---(10/25/2012)-KY.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Dec; 53(7):1. PubMed ID: 23383465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FL: Claims for injury released in suit in state 1: defendants-not named in release-sued in state 2. Berrios v. Orlando Regional Healthcare System, 5D11-3727 FLCA5 (9/21/2012)-FL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Oct; 53(5):3. PubMed ID: 23156021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Doctor "on call": ER nurse sued. Case in point: Bartimus v. Paxton Community Hosp. (458 N.E. 2d 1072 - IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Mar; 24(10):4. PubMed ID: 6561693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When patients refuse to cooperate--nurses may be responsible! Case in point: Hackathom v. Lester E. Cox Medical Center (624 S.W.2d 472--MO (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 May; 32(12):2. PubMed ID: 1410389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Known allergy not on printout: nurses' duties. Case in point: Harris County Hosp. Dist. v. Estrada 872 S.W. 2d 759 TX (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jun; 35(1):2. PubMed ID: 8047644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manning hospital hotlines can be risky for nurses. Case on point: Starkey v. St. Rita's Med. Ctr. 690 N.E. 2d 57--OH (1997).
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1998 Mar; 38(10):2. PubMed ID: 10067622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nurses were illegally barred from review panel. Case on point: Harlet v. St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Svcs, 2001 WL 503459 N.E.2d-IN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical sponge left in patient: nurses exonerated. Case in point: Tams v. Kotz (530 A. 2d 1217--D.C.).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Nov; 28(6):4. PubMed ID: 3423263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurses fail to keep physicians informed of multiple seizures. Case in point: Glassman v. St. Joseph Hospital 631 N.E. 2d 1186--IL (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jun; 35(1):4. PubMed ID: 8047646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polygraph tests for nurses ordered. Case in point: Marsh v. Lake Forest Hospital (519 N.E. 2d 504 (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):2. PubMed ID: 3368575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Unknown nurse" injects patient with dirty needle. Case in point: Stegmeier v. St. Elizabeth Hosp. (571 A. 2d 1006--NJ (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jun; 31(1):2. PubMed ID: 2371407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failure to recall & chart pt.'s fall: 'falsus in uno' test. Case on point: Green v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc., 2002 WL 371808 NE.2d. -DE.
    Tammelleo AD
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2002 Mar; 42(10):2. PubMed ID: 11980417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.