112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9258069)
1. The impact of tumor size on clinical outcome in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy.
Nativ O; Sabo E; Raviv G; Madjar S; Halachmi S; Moskovitz B
J Urol; 1997 Sep; 158(3 Pt 1):729-32. PubMed ID: 9258069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7 cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy.
Lane BR; Babineau D; Kattan MW; Novick AC; Gill IS; Zhou M; Weight CJ; Campbell SC
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 17561141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Localized renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy. Influence of pathologic data and the importance of DNA ploidy pattern on disease outcome.
Raviv G; Leibovich I; Mor Y; Nass D; Medalia O; Goldwasser B; Nativ O
Cancer; 1993 Oct; 72(7):2207-12. PubMed ID: 8374878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery.
Lerner SE; Hawkins CA; Blute ML; Grabner A; Wollan PC; Eickholt JT; Zincke H
J Urol; 1996 Jun; 155(6):1868-73. PubMed ID: 8618276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes following partial nephrectomy by tumor size.
Crispen PL; Boorjian SA; Lohse CM; Sebo TS; Cheville JC; Blute ML; Leibovich BC
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1912-7. PubMed ID: 18801543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of tumor size on oncological outcomes of pathological T3aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy.
Chen L; Ma X; Li H; Gu L; Li X; Gao Y; Xie Y; Zhang X
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173953. PubMed ID: 28288191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of pNx/pN0 grouping in a multivariate setting for outcome modeling in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Ward JF; Blute ML; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Weaver AL; Zincke H
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 12050492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microvascular tumor invasion, tumor size and Fuhrman grade: a pathological triad for prognostic evaluation of renal cell carcinoma.
Dall'Oglio MF; Ribeiro-Filho LA; Antunes AA; Crippa A; Nesrallah L; Gonçalves PD; Leite KR; Srougi M
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):425-8; discussion 428. PubMed ID: 17561167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of a 4 cm. cutoff point for stratification of T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy.
Igarashi T; Tobe T; Nakatsu HO; Suzuki N; Murakami S; Hamano M; Maruoka M; Nagayama T; Matsuzaki O; Ito H
J Urol; 2001 Apr; 165(4):1103-6. PubMed ID: 11257647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumor size does not predict risk of metastatic disease or prognosis of small renal cell carcinomas.
Klatte T; Patard JJ; de Martino M; Bensalah K; Verhoest G; de la Taille A; Abbou CC; Allhoff EP; Carrieri G; Riggs SB; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1719-26. PubMed ID: 18343437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of tumor size on renal function and prediction of renal insufficiency after radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Ohno Y; Nakashima J; Ohori M; Hashimoto T; Iseki R; Hatano T; Tachibana M
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1242-6. PubMed ID: 21849191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for non-metastatic pathological T3a renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional comparative analysis.
Oh JJ; Byun SS; Lee SE; Hong SK; Lee ES; Kim HH; Kwak C; Ku JH; Jeong CW; Kim YJ; Kang SH; Hong SH
Int J Urol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 24118633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Tumor Pseudocapsule Status and its Prognostic Significance in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Xi W; Wang J; Liu L; Xiong Y; Qu Y; Lin Z; Chen X; Wang Z; Xu J; Guo J
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):915-920. PubMed ID: 29128576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microscopic vascular invasion is the most relevant prognosticator after radical nephrectomy for clinically nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Van Poppel H; Vandendriessche H; Boel K; Mertens V; Goethuys H; Haustermans K; Van Damme B; Baert L
J Urol; 1997 Jul; 158(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9186320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance of tumour size in patients after tumour nephrectomy for localised renal cell carcinoma.
Steiner T; Knels R; Schubert J
Eur Urol; 2004 Sep; 46(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 15306102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is adrenalectomy a necessary component of radical nephrectomy? UCLA experience with 511 radical nephrectomies.
Tsui KH; Shvarts O; Barbaric Z; Figlin R; de Kernion JB; Belldegrun A
J Urol; 2000 Feb; 163(2):437-41. PubMed ID: 10647649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: analysis of 61 cases.
Peyromaure M; Misrai V; Thiounn N; Vieillefond A; Zerbib M; Flam TA; Debré B
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(7):1406-10. PubMed ID: 15042674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Elective nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm.
Pahernik S; Roos F; Röhrig B; Wiesner C; Thüroff JW
J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):71-4; discussion 74. PubMed ID: 17997423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of clinicopathological parameters in patients treated for renal cell carcinoma.
Dall'Oglio MF; Arap MA; Antunes AA; Cury J; Leite KR; Srougi M
J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1687-91. PubMed ID: 17437783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
