These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9258647)

  • 21. Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in men in the mid-west of Ireland.
    Powell J; O'Connor C; O'hlarlaithe M; Saunders J; De Freitas J
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 15459401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Chlamydia screening in Wellington Family Planning Association (FPA) clinics: a demonstration project.
    Sparrow M; Lewis H; Brown P; Bromhead C; Fernando D; Maitra A
    N Z Med J; 2007 Apr; 120(1252):U2490. PubMed ID: 17460740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy. To screen or not to screen?
    Carroll JC
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 Jan; 39():97-102. PubMed ID: 8435566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Chlamydia trachomatis screening in a family planning clinic.
    Yee AS; Twombly-al-Hallaq K; Kallail KJ; Walling AD; Pohlenz D
    Fam Pract Res J; 1993 Dec; 13(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 8285087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genital chlamydial disease in an urban, primarily Hispanic, family planning clinic.
    Neu NM; Grumet S; Saiman L; McMahon DJ; Westhoff C
    Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Jul; 25(6):317-21. PubMed ID: 9662767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.
    van Bergen J; Götz HM; Richardus JH; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ;
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15681716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in college women with a polymerase chain reaction assay.
    Cook RL; St George K; Lassak M; Tran N; Anhalt JP; Rinaldo CR
    Clin Infect Dis; 1999 May; 28(5):1002-7. PubMed ID: 10452625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening for chlamydia in general practice.
    Heal C; Jones B; Veitch C; Lamb S; Hodgens S; Browning S; Butler H; Carey M
    Aust Fam Physician; 2002 Aug; 31(8):779-82. PubMed ID: 12189675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The contribution of a urine-based jail screening program to citywide male Chlamydia and gonorrhea case rates in New York City.
    Pathela P; Hennessy RR; Blank S; Parvez F; Franklin W; Schillinger JA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Feb; 36(2 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 17989586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chlamydia prevalence and screening practices--San Diego County, California, 1993.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1994 May; 43(20):366-9, 375. PubMed ID: 8183228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Chlamydia in colposcopy clinics: to screen or not to screen?
    Matiluko A; Crystal A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Jul; 26(5):454-6. PubMed ID: 16846877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections and specimen collection preference among women, using self-collected vaginal swabs in community settings.
    Richardson E; Sellors JW; Mackinnon S; Woodcox V; Howard M; Jang D; Karwalajtys T; Chernesky MA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2003 Dec; 30(12):880-5. PubMed ID: 14646634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Criteria for selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Paukku M; Kilpikari R; Puolakkainen M; Oksanen H; Apter D; Paavonen J
    Sex Transm Dis; 2003 Feb; 30(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 12567168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Broer J; Hoebe CJ; Steyerberg EW; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15681717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prevalence and risk factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnant women.
    Kadzhaia D; Merabishvili N
    Georgian Med News; 2005 Dec; (129):33-6. PubMed ID: 16444025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by urine tests among adolescents clinics.
    Beck-Sague CM; Farshy CE; Jackson TK; Guillory L; Edelkind D; Bullard JC; Urdez EA; Jones B; Francis K; Sievert A; Morse SA; Black CM
    J Adolesc Health; 1998 Mar; 22(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 9502006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Chlamydia and associated factors in an under 20s antenatal population.
    Cheney K; Wray L
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Feb; 48(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 18275570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening pregnant women for chlamydia: what are the predictors of infection?
    Chen MY; Fairley CK; De Guingand D; Hocking J; Tabrizi S; Wallace EM; Grover S; Gurrin L; Carter R; Pirotta M; Garland S
    Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Feb; 85(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18708481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Non-invasive screening of teenagers for Chlamydia trachomatis in a family planning setting.
    Kirkwood K; Horn K; Glasier A; Sutherland S; Young H; Patrizio C
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Apr; 25(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 10228243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A cost-based decision analysis for Chlamydia screening in California family planning clinics.
    Trachtenberg AI; Washington AE; Halldorson S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 3122137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.