These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9259016)
1. No major differences in locomotor responses to dexamphetamine in high and low responders to novelty: a study in Wistar rats. Gingras MA; Cools AR Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Aug; 57(4):857-62. PubMed ID: 9259016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in vulnerability and susceptibility to dexamphetamine in Nijmegen high and low responders to novelty: a dose-effect analysis of spatio-temporal programming of behaviour. Cools AR; Ellenbroek BA; Gingras MA; Engbersen A; Heeren D Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Jul; 132(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 9266615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Different behavioral effects of daily or intermittent dexamphetamine administration in Nijmegen high and low responders. Gingras MA; Cools AR Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Jul; 132(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 9266616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of the biphasic locomotor response to ethanol in high and low responders to novelty: a study in Nijmegen Wistar rats. Gingras MA; Cools AR Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1996 Jun; 125(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 8815962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual responses to novelty predict qualitative differences in d-amphetamine-induced open field but not reward-related behaviors in rats. Antoniou K; Papathanasiou G; Panagis G; Nomikos GG; Hyphantis T; Papadopoulou-Daifoti Z Neuroscience; 2004; 123(3):613-23. PubMed ID: 14706774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine. Bevins RA; Peterson JL Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2004 Sep; 79(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 15388285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age and sex differences in the locomotor effect of repeated methylphenidate in rats classified as high or low novelty responders. Wooters TE; Dwoskin LP; Bardo MT Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Sep; 188(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 16896959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeated social defeat stress-induced sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of d-amphetamine: role of individual differences. Dietz DM; Dietz KC; Moore S; Ouimet CC; Kabbaj M Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2008 May; 198(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 18415082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine. Hooks MS; Jones GH; Smith AD; Neill DB; Justice JB Synapse; 1991 Oct; 9(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 1821483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The stimulant effect of modafinil on wakefulness is not associated with an increase in anxiety in mice. A comparison with dexamphetamine. Simon P; Panissaud C; Costentin J Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1994 May; 114(4):597-600. PubMed ID: 7855221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of a novel environment on alcohol-induced locomotor activity in Wistar rats. Hernández-Vázquez F; Reyes-Guzmán C; Méndez M Alcohol; 2018 Sep; 71():5-13. PubMed ID: 29929089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dopamine transporter, but not tyrosine hydroxylase, may be implicated in determining individual differences in behavioral sensitization to amphetamine. Dietz DM; Tapocik J; Gaval-Cruz M; Kabbaj M Physiol Behav; 2005 Oct; 86(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 16126238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between MRNA levels and the locomotor response to novelty. Hooks MS; Sorg BA; Kalivas PW Brain Res; 1994 Nov; 663(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 7874516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Novelty response and 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations: Differential prediction of locomotor and affective response to amphetamine in Sprague-Dawley rats. Garcia EJ; Cain ME Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Feb; 233(4):625-37. PubMed ID: 26564232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug. Pierre PJ; Vezina P Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1997 Feb; 129(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 9084067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual differences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to opioid drugs in the rat. I. Expression of morphine-induced locomotor sensitization. Kalinichev M; White DA; Holtzman SG Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Dec; 177(1-2):61-7. PubMed ID: 15316716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissociation of novelty- and cocaine-conditioned locomotor activity from cocaine place conditioning. Kosten TA; Miserendino MJ Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Aug; 60(4):785-91. PubMed ID: 9700959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization. Hooks MS; Jones GH; Smith AD; Neill DB; Justice JB Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1991 Feb; 38(2):467-70. PubMed ID: 2057515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individual differences in novelty-seeking behavior in spontaneously hypertensive rats: Enhanced sensitivity to the reinforcing effect of methylphenidate in the high novelty-preferring subpopulation. dela Peña I; Gonzales EL; de la Peña JB; Kim BN; Han DH; Shin CY; Cheong JH J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Aug; 252():48-54. PubMed ID: 25169048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]