These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9259237)

  • 1. Suppression of otoacoustic emission is unchanged after several minutes of contralateral acoustic stimulation.
    Giraud AL; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    Hear Res; 1997 Jul; 109(1-2):78-82. PubMed ID: 9259237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.
    Hill JC; Prasher DK; Luxon LM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9199519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contralateral acoustic stimulation induces a phase advance in evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Giraud AL; Perrin E; Chéry-Croze S; Chays A; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 8789811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Duclaux R
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Andéol G; Gallégo S; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 140(1-2):111-25. PubMed ID: 10675639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Changes in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions contralateral suppression in infants].
    Durante AS; Carvallo RM
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 16625871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Slow build-up of cochlear suppression during sustained contralateral noise: central modulation of olivocochlear efferents?
    Larsen E; Liberman MC
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 19232534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ryan S; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional maturation of cochlear active mechanisms and of the medial olivocochlear system in humans.
    Morlet T; Collet L; Salle B; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 May; 113(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 8517127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeatability of click-evoked otoacoustic emission-based medial olivocochlear efferent assay.
    Mishra SK; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 23739244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Zhao W; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 19798532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Efferent suppression test--sensitivity and specificity].
    Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Misiołek M; Scierski W; Orecka B; Czecior E; Dziendziel A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 19205524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralaterally evoked transient otoacoustic emissions.
    Pratt H; Shi Y; Polyakov A
    Hear Res; 1998 Jan; 115(1-2):39-44. PubMed ID: 9472734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Souter M
    Hear Res; 1995 Nov; 91(1-2):167-77. PubMed ID: 8647718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of the contralateral acoustic stimulation on the acoustic otoemissions: response modulation by the efferent olivocochlear system].
    Morant Ventura A; Marco Algarra J; Caballero Mallea J; Orts Alborch M; Sequi Canet JM; Mir Planas B
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1992; 43(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 1492986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of crossed olivocochlear bundle section on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Kakigi A; Hirakawa H; Mount RJ; Harrison RV
    Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 110(1-2):34-8. PubMed ID: 9282887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.