108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9259522)
1. Accuracy of a registration procedure for brain SPET and MRI: phantom and simulation studies.
Sipilä O; Nikkinen P; Pohjonen H; Poutanen VP; Visa A; Savolainen S; Katila T; Liewendahl K
Nucl Med Commun; 1997 Jun; 18(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 9259522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transmission imaging for registration of ictal and interictal single-photon emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography.
Sipilä O; Nikkinen P; Savolainen S; Granström ML; Gaily E; Poutanen VP; Pohjonen H; Liewendahl K
Eur J Nucl Med; 2000 Feb; 27(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 10755726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI-SPET and SPET-SPET brain co-registration: evaluation of the performance of eight different algorithms.
Koole M; D'Asseler Y; Van Laere K; Van de Walle R; Van de Wiele C; Lemahieu I; Dierckx RA
Nucl Med Commun; 1999 Jul; 20(7):659-69. PubMed ID: 10423768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subtraction ictal SPET co-registered to MRI in partial epilepsy: description and technical validation of the method with phantom and patient studies.
O'Brien TJ; O'Connor MK; Mullan BP; Brinkmann BH; Hanson D; Jack CR; So EL
Nucl Med Commun; 1998 Jan; 19(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 9515545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of fully automatic brain SPET to MR co-registration.
Barnden L; Kwiatek R; Lau Y; Hutton B; Thurfjell L; Pile K; Rowe C
Eur J Nucl Med; 2000 Feb; 27(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 10755719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of deformable image registration on magnetic resonance images in digital and physical phantoms.
Ger RB; Yang J; Ding Y; Jacobsen MC; Fuller CD; Howell RM; Li H; Jason Stafford R; Zhou S; Court LE
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5153-5161. PubMed ID: 28622410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The accuracy of image registration for the brain and the nasopharynx using external anatomical landmarks.
Peters AR; Muller SH; de Munck JC; van Herk M
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Aug; 45(8):2403-16. PubMed ID: 10958203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An imaging co-registration system using novel non-invasive and non-radioactive external markers.
Wu TH; Wang JK; Lee JJ; Liu RS; Guo WY
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jun; 30(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 12692690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An externally and internally deformable, programmable lung motion phantom.
Cheung Y; Sawant A
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2585-93. PubMed ID: 25979050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proportional anatomical stereotactic atlas for visual interpretation of brain SPET perfusion images.
Véra P; Farman-Ara B; Stiévenart JL; Gardin I; Habert MO; de Dreuille O; Samson Y; Bourguignon M; Bok B
Eur J Nucl Med; 1996 Aug; 23(8):871-7. PubMed ID: 8753674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SPET/CT image co-registration in the abdomen with a simple and cost-effective tool.
Förster GJ; Laumann C; Nickel O; Kann P; Rieker O; Bartenstein P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jan; 30(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 12483407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new set of fiducial markers for MRI, CT and SPET alignment.
Vikhoff-Baaz B; Bergh AC; Starck G; Ekholm S; Wikkelsö C
Nucl Med Commun; 1997 Dec; 18(12):1148-54. PubMed ID: 9481761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphology-oriented analysis of cerebral SPET using matched magnetic resonance images.
Stollberger R; Fazekas F; Payer F; Flooh E
Nucl Med Commun; 1995 Apr; 16(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 7624107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved volumetric measurement of brain structure with a distortion correction procedure using an ADNI phantom.
Maikusa N; Yamashita F; Tanaka K; Abe O; Kawaguchi A; Kabasawa H; Chiba S; Kasahara A; Kobayashi N; Yuasa T; Sato N; Matsuda H; Iwatsubo T;
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):062303. PubMed ID: 23718605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of resolution recovery by using collimator detector response during 3D OSEM image reconstruction on (99m)Tc-ECD brain SPET images.
Kalantari F; Rajabi H; Ay MR; Razavi-Ratki SK; Fard-Esfahani A; Beiki D; Eftekhari M; Fallahi B; Sadeghian L; Emami-Ardekani A
Hell J Nucl Med; 2012; 15(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 22741145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel phantom design for emission tomography enabling scatter- and attenuation-"free" single-photon emission tomography imaging.
Larsson SA; Jonsson C; Pagani M; Johansson L; Jacobsson H
Eur J Nucl Med; 2000 Feb; 27(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 10755717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptance test of a commercially available software for automatic image registration of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) brain images.
Loi G; Dominietto M; Manfredda I; Mones E; Carriero A; Inglese E; Krengli M; Brambilla M
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Sep; 21(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 17549564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved efficiency for MRI-SPET registration based on mutual information.
Thurfjell L; Lau YH; Andersson JL; Hutton BF
Eur J Nucl Med; 2000 Jul; 27(7):847-56. PubMed ID: 10952497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An accuracy assessment of different rigid body image registration methods and robotic couch positional corrections using a novel phantom.
Arumugam S; Jameson MG; Xing A; Holloway L
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031701. PubMed ID: 23464296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
