These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9260296)

  • 21. [Evaluation of indications for PTCA].
    Kadel C
    Herz; 1996 Dec; 21(6):347-58. PubMed ID: 9081904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association.
    Brindis RG; Douglas PS; Hendel RC; Peterson ED; Wolk MJ; Allen JM; Patel MR; Raskin IE; Hendel RC; Bateman TM; Cerqueira MD; Gibbons RJ; Gillam LD; Gillespie JA; Hendel RC; Iskandrian AE; Jerome SD; Krumholz HM; Messer JV; Spertus JA; Stowers SA; ; ;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(8):1587-605. PubMed ID: 16226194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Newfoundland and Labrador.
    Fox GA; O'Dea J; Parfrey PS
    CMAJ; 1998 May; 158(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 9597964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Lipid-lowering therapy in patients with coronary disease: proportion of patients requiring treatment according to recommendations of the Swiss Society of Cardiology].
    Muntwyler J; Amann FW; Gutzwiller F; Follath F
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1999 Dec; 129(50):1959-63. PubMed ID: 10637948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hypothetical ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness: are they associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rate? The ACRE study.
    Hemingway H; Crook AM; Banerjee S; Dawson JR; Feder G; Magee PG; Wood A; Philpott S; Timmis A
    Heart; 2001 Jun; 85(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 11359750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of panel composition on physician ratings of appropriateness of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: elucidating differences between multispecialty panel results and specialty society recommendations.
    Herrin J; Etchason JA; Kahan JP; Brook RH; Ballard DJ
    Health Policy; 1997 Oct; 42(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 10173494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnosis and treatment of coronary disease: comparison of doctors' attitudes in the USA and the UK.
    Brook RH; Kosecoff JB; Park RE; Chassin MR; Winslow CM; Hampton JR
    Lancet; 1988 Apr; 1(8588):750-3. PubMed ID: 2895272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measuring the clinical consistency of panelists' appropriateness ratings: the case of coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Kravitz RL; Park RE; Kahan JP
    Health Policy; 1997 Nov; 42(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 10175621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validity of criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary revascularization.
    Kravitz RL; Laouri M; Kahan JP; Guzy P; Sherman T; Hilborne L; Brook RH
    JAMA; 1995 Aug 23-30; 274(8):632-8. PubMed ID: 7637144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Heart Team: Joint Position of the Swiss Society of Cardiology and the Swiss Society of Cardiac Surgery.
    Pedrazzini GB; Ferrari E; Zellweger M; Genoni M
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Oct; 65(7):519-523. PubMed ID: 28922674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The appropriate management of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in primary care: a systematic analysis of expert opinion.
    Stoevelaar HJ; McDonnell J; Stals H; Smets L;
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2003; 66(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 14989047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Appropriate treatment for Crohn's disease: methodology and summary results of a multidisciplinary international expert panel approach--EPACT.
    Vader JP; Froehlich F; Juillerat P; Burnand B; Felley C; Gonvers JJ; Mottet C; Pittet V; Dubois RW; Wietlisbach V; Michetti P
    Digestion; 2006; 73(4):237-48. PubMed ID: 16940727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures.
    Shekelle PG; Kahan JP; Bernstein SJ; Leape LL; Kamberg CJ; Park RE
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jun; 338(26):1888-95. PubMed ID: 9637810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Swan Ganz catheter. Experts opinion].
    Cohen Arazi H; Nani S; Giorgi M; Guardiani F; Caturla N; Benzadón M;
    Medicina (B Aires); 2014; 74(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 25188663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison of American and Swiss criteria.
    Vader JP; Burnand B; Froehlich F; Dupriez K; Larequi-Lauber T; Pache I; Dubois RW; Gonvers JJ; Brook RH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1997 Apr; 9(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 9154494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship of anatomic disease to appropriateness ratings of coronary angiography.
    Noonan SJ; Cook JL; Keller CE; Rosenkrans CM; Healy JM; Feingold L; Schoenbaum SC
    Arch Intern Med; 1995 Jun; 155(11):1209-13. PubMed ID: 7763127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality assessment in gynecology and obstetrics. Projects and experience in Switzerland.
    Haller U; Wyss P; Schilling J; Gutzwiller F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Jan; 76(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 9481552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rating the urgency of coronary angiography: results of an expert panel process. Ontario Coronary Angiography Panel.
    Basinski AS; Almond DG; James RG; Naylor CD
    Can J Cardiol; 1993 May; 9(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 8513424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group.
    ; ; ; ; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Oct; 3(10):751-71. PubMed ID: 17412166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability of clinical guideline development using mail-only versus in-person expert panels.
    Washington DL; Bernstein SJ; Kahan JP; Leape LL; Kamberg CJ; Shekelle PG
    Med Care; 2003 Dec; 41(12):1374-81. PubMed ID: 14668670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.