These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9261690)

  • 1. Factors influencing stability at the interface between a porous surface and cancellous bone: a finite element analysis of a canine in vivo micromotion experiment.
    Ramamurti BS; Orr TE; Bragdon CR; Lowenstein JD; Jasty M; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Aug; 36(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 9261690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis on mechanical behavior of the bone remodeling and bone integration between the bone-implant interface after hip replacement].
    Li YJ; Zhang LC; Zhang MC; Yang GJ; Lin RX; Cai CY; Zhong SZ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2014 Apr; 27(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 25029841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion.
    Bragdon CR; Burke D; Lowenstein JD; O'Connor DO; Ramamurti B; Jasty M; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1996 Dec; 11(8):945-51. PubMed ID: 8986573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of mechanical behaviors at interfaces between bone and two interbody cages of lumbar spine segments.
    Kim Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(13):1437-42. PubMed ID: 11458147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Explicit finite element analysis can predict the mechanical response of conical implant press-fit in homogenized trabecular bone.
    Ovesy M; Aeschlimann M; Zysset PK
    J Biomech; 2020 Jun; 107():109844. PubMed ID: 32517857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary stability of uncemented femoral resurfacing implants for varying interface parameters and material formulations during walking and stair climbing.
    Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Morlock M
    J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):521-6. PubMed ID: 19913227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical bone viscoelasticity and fixation strength of press-fit femoral stems: finite element model.
    Shultz TR; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Norman TL
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Feb; 128(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 16532611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the mechanical stability of porous coated press fit titanium implants: a finite element study of a pushout test.
    Helgason B; Viceconti M; Rúnarsson TP; Brynjólfsson S
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(8):1675-81. PubMed ID: 18471819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation.
    Perona PG; Lawrence J; Paprosky WG; Patwardhan AG; Sartori M
    J Arthroplasty; 1992 Dec; 7(4):537-47. PubMed ID: 1479374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the stiffness of bone defect implants on the mechanical conditions at the interface--a finite element analysis with contact.
    Simon U; Augat P; Ignatius A; Claes L
    J Biomech; 2003 Aug; 36(8):1079-86. PubMed ID: 12831732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of Young's modulus of loaded implants on bone remodeling: an experimental and numerical study in the goat knee.
    Stoppie N; Van Oosterwyck H; Jansen J; Wolke J; Wevers M; Naert I
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Sep; 90(3):792-803. PubMed ID: 18615463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nonlinear homogenized finite element analysis of the primary stability of the bone-implant interface.
    Ovesy M; Voumard B; Zysset P
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Oct; 17(5):1471-1480. PubMed ID: 29858707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stem geometry changes initial femoral fixation stability of a revised press-fit hip prosthesis: A finite element study.
    Russell RD; Huo MH; Rodrigues DC; Kosmopoulos V
    Technol Health Care; 2016 Nov; 24(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 27434281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of coating characteristics on implant-bone interface mechanics.
    Sánchez E; de Vries E; Matthews D; van der Heide E; Janssen D
    J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111949. PubMed ID: 38281459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA; O'Connor D; Jasty M; McGovern TF; Bobyn JD; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of bone damage on press-fit mechanics.
    Bishop NE; Höhn JC; Rothstock S; Damm NB; Morlock MM
    J Biomech; 2014 Apr; 47(6):1472-8. PubMed ID: 24503049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Stress distribution in press-fit orthodontic microimplant bone interface].
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF; Xu XJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Dec; 15(6):619-22. PubMed ID: 17533715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of joint load, motions and contact stress and bone-implant interface micromotion of three implant designs for total ankle arthroplasty.
    Zhang Y; Chen Z; Zhao H; Zhao D; Zhang X; Ma X; Jin Z
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Aug; 223():106976. PubMed ID: 35785557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of sidewall retention and interference fit in total ankle replacement on implant-bone micromotion: A finite element study.
    Johnson JE; Clarke GA; de Cesar Netto C; Anderson DD
    J Orthop Res; 2024 Jul; 42(7):1536-1544. PubMed ID: 38327023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of primary stability on load transfer and bone remodelling within the uncemented resurfaced femur.
    Pal B; Gupta S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):549-61. PubMed ID: 22034739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.