These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9262027)

  • 1. A Monte Carlo model for bone mineral measurement using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Michael GJ; Sim LH; van Doorn T
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Jun; 20(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 9262027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulation studies of optimum energies for DXA: dependence on tissue type, patient size and dose model.
    Michael GJ; Henderson CJ
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Dec; 22(4):126-35. PubMed ID: 10740885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.
    Wahner HW; Dunn WL; Brown ML; Morin RL; Riggs BL
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1988 Nov; 63(11):1075-84. PubMed ID: 3193817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A phantom for evaluating bone mineral density of the hand by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Steel SA; Swann P; Langley G; Langton CM
    Physiol Meas; 1997 Aug; 18(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 9290140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur.
    Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
    Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo modelling of an extended DXA technique.
    Michael GJ; Henderson CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Sep; 43(9):2583-96. PubMed ID: 9755947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose and in vitro precision in paediatric bone mineral density measurement using dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Njeh CF; Samat SB; Nightingale A; McNeil EA; Boivin CM
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):719-27. PubMed ID: 9245884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of adult and paediatric spine and whole body software for the Lunar dual energy X-ray absorptiometer.
    Laskey MA; Prentice A
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Oct; 72(862):967-76. PubMed ID: 10673948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calibration of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for bone density.
    Mazess RB; Trempe JA; Bisek JP; Hanson JA; Hans D
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Aug; 6(8):799-806. PubMed ID: 1785372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-energy bone densitometry using a single 100 ns x-ray pulse.
    Seely JF; Boyer CN; Holland GE
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2027-36. PubMed ID: 9800712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode.
    Laskey MA; Lyttle KD; Flaxman ME; Barber RW
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 Jan; 46(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 1559506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of dual-photon absorptiometry systems for total-body bone and soft tissue measurements: dual-energy X-rays versus gadolinium 153.
    Russell-Aulet M; Wang J; Thornton J; Pierson RN
    J Bone Miner Res; 1991 Apr; 6(4):411-5. PubMed ID: 1858524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Larcos G; Wahner HW
    J Nucl Med; 1991 Nov; 32(11):2101-6. PubMed ID: 1941145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry as a method of measurement of body fat.
    Pritchard JE; Nowson CA; Strauss BJ; Carlson JS; Kaymakci B; Wark JD
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 Mar; 47(3):216-28. PubMed ID: 8458318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inaccuracies inherent in patient-specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density measurements: comprehensive phantom-based evaluation.
    Bolotin HH; Sievänen H; Grashuis JL; Kuiper JW; Järvinen TL
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Feb; 16(2):417-26. PubMed ID: 11204442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the European Spine Phantom in a multi-centre clinical trial.
    Lees B; Garland SW; Walton C; Stevenson JC
    Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(6):570-4. PubMed ID: 9604054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of forearm bone mineral density in normal women by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Ryan PJ; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Feb; 65(770):127-31. PubMed ID: 1540802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discordance of longitudinal changes in bone density between densitometers.
    Frost SA; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
    Bone; 2007 Oct; 41(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 17870039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic measurement of bone mineral: reviewing dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Sim LH; van Doorn T
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1995 Jun; 18(2):65-80. PubMed ID: 7669025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.