472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9262288)
1. Selective transfer of cryopreserved human embryos with further cleavage after thawing increases delivery and implantation rates.
Van der Elst J; Van den Abbeel E; Vitrier S; Camus M; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem AC
Hum Reprod; 1997 Jul; 12(7):1513-21. PubMed ID: 9262288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human Day 3 embryos.
Van Landuyt L; Van de Velde H; De Vos A; Haentjens P; Blockeel C; Tournaye H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):2943-9. PubMed ID: 24014599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term evaluation of implantation of fresh and cryopreserved human embryos following ovarian stimulation with buserelin acetate-human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) or clomiphene citrate-HMG.
Van der Elst J; Van den Abbeel E; Camus M; Smitz J; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem A
Hum Reprod; 1996 Oct; 11(10):2097-106. PubMed ID: 8943509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vitrification of cleavage stage day 3 embryos results in higher live birth rates than conventional slow freezing: a RCT.
Debrock S; Peeraer K; Fernandez Gallardo E; De Neubourg D; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1820-30. PubMed ID: 26089301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pronuclear stage cryopreservation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional IVF: implications for timing of the freeze.
Damario MA; Hammitt DG; Galanits TM; Session DR; Dumesic DA
Fertil Steril; 1999 Dec; 72(6):1049-54. PubMed ID: 10593380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cryopreservation of supernumerary multicellular human embryos obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Van Steirteghem AC; Van der Elst J; Van den Abbeel E; Joris H; Camus M; Devroey P
Fertil Steril; 1994 Oct; 62(4):775-80. PubMed ID: 7926086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Developmentally delayed cleavage-stage embryos maintain comparable implantation rates in frozen embryo transfers.
Burks H; Buckbinder J; Francis-Hernandez M; Chung K; Jabara S; Bendikson K; Paulson R
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Oct; 32(10):1477-81. PubMed ID: 26347340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A flexible protocol for cryopreservation of pronuclear and cleavage stage embryos created by conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Amarin ZO
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15541856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Viability of partially damaged human embryos after cryopreservation.
Van den Abbeel E; Camus M; Van Waesberghe L; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem AC
Hum Reprod; 1997 Sep; 12(9):2006-10. PubMed ID: 9363721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of day 3 embryo morphometrics and morphokinetics on survival and implantation after slow freezing-thawing and after vitrification-warming: a retrospective cohort study.
Fernandez Gallardo E; Spiessens C; D'Hooghe T; Debrock S
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Oct; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28974230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of developmental stage of embryo at freezing on pregnancy outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
Salumets A; Tuuri T; Mäkinen S; Vilska S; Husu L; Tainio R; Suikkari AM
Hum Reprod; 2003 Sep; 18(9):1890-5. PubMed ID: 12923145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential factors affecting embryo survival and clinical outcome with cryopreserved pronuclear human embryos.
Marrs RP; Greene J; Stone BA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1766-71; discussion 1771-2. PubMed ID: 15284794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of cryopreservation outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization.
Simon A; Holzer H; Hurwitz A; Revel A; Zentner BS; Lossos F; Laufer N
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1998 Aug; 15(7):431-7. PubMed ID: 9717119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
Veleva Z; Orava M; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2425-31. PubMed ID: 23756705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of pregnancy outcome of pronuclear- and multicellular-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers.
Kattera S; Shrivastav P; Craft I
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1999 Aug; 16(7):358-62. PubMed ID: 10459518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical experience with ultrarapid cryopreservation of human embryos resulting from intracytoplasmic sperm injection: brief communication.
Mauri AL; Petersen CG; Baruffi RL; Ferreira RC; Franco JG
Hum Reprod; 1999 Sep; 14(9):2362-6. PubMed ID: 10469711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective randomized study of two cryopreservation policies avoiding embryo selection: the pronucleate stage leads to a higher cumulative delivery rate than the early cleavage stage.
Senn A; Vozzi C; Chanson A; De Grandi P; Germond M
Fertil Steril; 2000 Nov; 74(5):946-52. PubMed ID: 11056238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of post-thaw culture on the developmental potential of human frozen embryos.
Rato ML; Gouveia-Oliveira A; Plancha CE
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2012 Aug; 29(8):789-95. PubMed ID: 22614160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hyperstimulation: the need for cryopreservation of embryos.
Van den Abbeel E; Van der Elst J; Van Waesberghe L; Camus M; Devroey P; Khan I; Smitz J; Staessen C; Wisanto A; Van Steirteghem A
Hum Reprod; 1988 Oct; 3 Suppl 2():53-7. PubMed ID: 3230120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of two formulations of slow-freezing solutions for cleavage stage embryos.
Fang L; Jin L; Li E; Cui L; Ye Y
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Oct; 33(10):1389-1393. PubMed ID: 27465302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
