197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9262386)
1. US to tighten protection of medical data.
Wadman M
Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6643):611. PubMed ID: 9262386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of the new federal medical-privacy rule on research.
Kulynych J; Korn D
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 11796857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical records ruling should not hamper research.
Ault A
Nat Med; 1999 Dec; 5(12):1337. PubMed ID: 10581057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical privacy and medical research--judging the new federal regulations.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 11796863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New duties for the sentinels.
Palca J
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(5):2. PubMed ID: 8002302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. IRB triage of projects that involve medical record review.
Amdur R; Speers MA; Bankert E
IRB; 2000 Jan; 22(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 12546009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Privacy bill under fire from researchers.
Wadman M
Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6671):6. PubMed ID: 9510231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical privacy and medical research.
Rosenfeld CR
N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(21):1674. PubMed ID: 12024008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The use and disclosure of protected health information for research under the HIPAA privacy rule: unrealized patient autonomy and burdensome government regulation.
Tovino SA
S D Law Rev; 2004; 49(3):447-502. PubMed ID: 16493842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutional review boards would have to verify certain confidentiality protections.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):9. PubMed ID: 11658038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New confidentiality duties for institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. If I am only for myself, what am I? A communitarian look at the privacy stalemate.
Rubinstein HG
Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(2-3):203-31. PubMed ID: 10476329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health and the right to privacy.
Starr P
Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(2-3):193-201. PubMed ID: 10476328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How research will adapt to HIPAA: a view from within the healthcare delivery system.
Durham ML
Am J Law Med; 2002; 28(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 12516178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidentiality as an organizational ethics issue.
Hall R
J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 10693048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US privacy laws may curb access to medical data.
Wadman M
Nature; 1997 Apr; 386(6625):533. PubMed ID: 9121564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical record confidentiality and data collection: current dilemmas.
Woodward B
J Law Med Ethics; 1997; 25(2-3):88-97, 82. PubMed ID: 11066503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Privacy rules set no new research curbs.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Sep; 277(5333):1757. PubMed ID: 9324761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Coping with the federal alcohol and drug abuse regulations.
Felt JK
Trustee; 1977 Dec; 30(12):10-5. PubMed ID: 10316560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
