140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9262502)
1. The promise and problems of meta-analysis.
Bailar JC
N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):559-61. PubMed ID: 9262502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
Stewart LA; Parmar MK; Tierney JF
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):61; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
Ioannidis JP; Cappelleri JC; Lau J
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):59; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Pereira C; Castilho E
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.
da Costa BR; Hilfiker R; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 23177896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [A wide perspective on meta-analysis--may be of crucial significance for the patients].
Gøtzsche PC
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(23):2810. PubMed ID: 11107932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
Ferrer RL
Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?
Ioannidis JP; Lau J
Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):590-1. PubMed ID: 9746014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Commentary: Empirical evidence of attrition bias in clinical trials.
Jüni P; Egger M
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):87-8. PubMed ID: 15649954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Importance of a wide perspective on meta-analysis. It may be of crucial significance for the patients].
Gøtzsche PC
Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(42):5601. PubMed ID: 11059294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Allocation concealment in clinical trials.
Schulz KF; Altman DG; Moher D
JAMA; 2002 Nov; 288(19):2406-7; author reply 2408-9. PubMed ID: 12435253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fables or foibles: inherent problems with RCTs.
Rosner A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Sep; 26(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 12975633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Danger of misuse of meta-analyses for observational studies based on published data.
Sauerbrei W; Blettner M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():33. PubMed ID: 11187567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses.
Furukawa TA; Watanabe N; Omori IM; Montori VM; Guyatt GH
JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 17284696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis and meta-analytic monitoring of clinical trials.
Feinstein AR
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1273-80; discussion 1281-3. PubMed ID: 8817801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observational studies and randomized trials.
Kunz R; Khan KS; Neumayer HH
N Engl J Med; 2000 Oct; 343(16):1194-5; author reply 1196-7. PubMed ID: 11041757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different methods of allocation to groups in randomized trials are associated with different levels of bias. A meta-epidemiological study.
Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1070-5. PubMed ID: 21474279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
