378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9262801)
1. A comparative study of midazolam to meperidine/promethazine as an IM sedative technique for the pediatric dental patient.
Downs AT; Dembo J; Ferretti G; Lyons TD; Pelphery A
ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(3):197-200, 165, 228. PubMed ID: 9262801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Safety, efficacy, and acceptance of intramuscular sedation: assessment of 900 dental cases.
Lu DP; Lu GP; Reed JF
Compendium; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1348, 1350, 1352 passim; quiz 1362. PubMed ID: 7758023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the safety, efficacy and recovery of intranasal midazolam vs. oral chloral hydrate and promethazine.
Dallman JA; Ignelzi MA; Briskie DM
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 11699169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral ketamine/midazolam is superior to intramuscular meperidine, promethazine, and chlorpromazine for pediatric cardiac catheterization.
Auden SM; Sobczyk WL; Solinger RE; Goldsmith LJ
Anesth Analg; 2000 Feb; 90(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 10648310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of oral chloral hydrate with intramuscular ketamine, meperidine, and promethazine for pediatric sedation--preliminary report.
Campbell RL; Ross GA; Campbell JR; Mourino AP
Anesth Prog; 1998; 45(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 10356431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midazolam with meperidine and dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam with meperidine for sedation during ERCP: prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial.
Lee BS; Ryu J; Lee SH; Lee MG; Jang SE; Hwang JH; Ryu JK; Do SH; Kim YT
Endoscopy; 2014 Apr; 46(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 24671858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oral midazolam with and without meperidine for management of the difficult young pediatric dental patient: a retrospective study.
Nathan JE; Vargas KG
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 11991315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sedation for colonoscopy using a single bolus is safe, effective, and efficient: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.
Morrow JB; Zuccaro G; Conwell DL; Vargo JJ; Dumot JA; Karafa M; Shay SS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Sep; 95(9):2242-7. PubMed ID: 11007224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a randomized trial.
Hayee B; Dunn J; Loganayagam A; Wong M; Saxena V; Rowbotham D; McNair A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 2):681-7. PubMed ID: 19251010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the efficacy of oral midazolam alone versus midazolam and meperidine in the pediatric dental patient.
Musial KM; Wilson S; Preisch J; Weaver J
Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(5):468-74. PubMed ID: 14649610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study.
Riphaus A; Stergiou N; Wehrmann T
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 100(9):1957-63. PubMed ID: 16128939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does midazolam alter the clinical effects of intravenous ketamine sedation in children? A double-blind, randomized, controlled, emergency department trial.
Wathen JE; Roback MG; Mackenzie T; Bothner JP
Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Dec; 36(6):579-88. PubMed ID: 11097698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of combined meperidine and midazolam for EGD sedation compared with midazolam alone.
Diab FH; King PD; Barthel JS; Marshall JB
Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1120-5. PubMed ID: 8651156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of transmucosal midazolam with inhalation sedation for dental extractions in children. A randomized, cross-over, clinical trial.
Wilson KE; Welbury RR; Girdler NM
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Sep; 51(8):1062-7. PubMed ID: 17697301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Acceptability of high colonoscopy using different premedication--a comparison of the effect of midazolam versus midazolam and pethidine from the viewpoint of the patient and the physician].
Ehrle UB; Horschler B; Singer MV
Z Gastroenterol; 1995 Dec; 33(12):704-8. PubMed ID: 8585252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopist administered sedation during ERCP: impact of chronic narcotic/benzodiazepine use and predictive risk of reversal agent utilization.
Papachristou GI; Gleeson FC; Papachristou DJ; Petersen BT; Baron TH
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Apr; 102(4):738-43. PubMed ID: 17324132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the effect of orally versus submucosally administered meperidine on the behavior of pediatric dental patients: a retrospective study.
Song YU; Webb MD
Anesth Prog; 2003; 50(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 14558588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Behavioral assessments of two drug combinations for oral sedation.
Sams DR; Cook EW; Jackson JG; Roebuck BL
Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 8378156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Midazolam and pethidine/promethazine for intramuscular premedication].
Tolksdorf W; Gerlach C; Hartung M; Hettenbach A
Anaesthesist; 1987 Jun; 36(6):275-9. PubMed ID: 3631495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Project USAP 2000--use of sedative agents by pediatric dentists: a 15-year follow-up survey.
Houpt M
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 12212869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
