BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

26 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9262848)

  • 1. Removal of urea by electro-oxidation in a miniature dialysis device: a study in awake goats.
    Wester M; van Gelder MK; Joles JA; Simonis F; Hazenbrink DHM; van Berkel TWM; Vaessen KRD; Boer WH; Verhaar MC; Gerritsen KGF
    Am J Physiol Renal Physiol; 2018 Nov; 315(5):F1385-F1397. PubMed ID: 29993277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of four different high-flux hemodialyzers under conventional conditions in vivo.
    Sombolos K; Tsitamidou Z; Kyriazis G; Karagianni A; Kantaropoulou M; Progia E
    Am J Nephrol; 1997; 17(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 9382156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of hemodialyzer reuse: dissociation between clearances of small and large solutes.
    Leypoldt JK; Cheung AK; Deeter RB
    Am J Kidney Dis; 1998 Aug; 32(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 9708616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemodiafiltration using readily available equipment.
    Kohnle W; Sprenger K; Spohn B; Franz HE
    J Dial; 1979; 3(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 381340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemodiafiltration--a new treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients.
    Zehnder C; Gutzwiller JP; Renggli K
    Clin Nephrol; 1999 Sep; 52(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 10499310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dialyzer clearances and mass transfer-area coefficients for small solutes at low dialysate flow rates.
    Leypoldt JK; Kamerath CD; Gilson JF; Friederichs G
    ASAIO J; 2006; 52(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 16883120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the effects of low dialysate flow rates on removal rates and clearance using high flux membranes.
    Park KI; Tomoyoshi T
    Blood Purif; 1997; 15(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 9262848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structural and functional characteristics of currently available PMMA dialyzers.
    Ghezzi PM; Meinero S; Ronco C
    Contrib Nephrol; 1999; 125():25-40. PubMed ID: 9895428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quantifying dialysis efficiency for middle molecules in haemodialysis and in convective and mixed techniques].
    Casino FG; Lopez T
    G Ital Nefrol; 2008; 25(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 18264920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can convective therapies improve dialysis outcomes?
    Locatelli F; Manzoni C; Cavalli A; Di Filippo S
    Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens; 2009 Nov; 18(6):476-80. PubMed ID: 19726986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of dialysis adequacy.
    Gotch FA
    Contrib Nephrol; 1989; 69():101-8; discussion 162-7. PubMed ID: 2661134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving removal of protein-bound retention solutes.
    Bammens B; Evenepoel P
    Contrib Nephrol; 2005; 149():175-184. PubMed ID: 15876842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.