126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9263253)
1. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a closed enteral feeding system under cyclic feeding conditions: a microbial and cost evaluation.
Moffitt SK; Gohman SM; Sass KM; Faucher KJ
Nutrition; 1997; 13(7-8):622-8. PubMed ID: 9263253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of system design on bacterial contamination of enteral tube feeds.
McKinlay J; Wildgoose A; Wood W; Gould IM; Anderton A
J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 11170778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contamination of gastrostomy feeding systems in children in a home-based enteral nutrition program.
Bott L; Husson MO; Guimber D; Michaud L; Arnaud-Battandier F; Turck D; Gottrand F
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2001 Sep; 33(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 11593120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the bacteriological contamination of a closed feeding system for enteral nutrition.
Chan L; Yasmin AH; Ngeow YF; Ong GS
Med J Malaysia; 1994 Mar; 49(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 8057993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the microbial safety of a new 1.5 l enteral feeding diet reservoir system.
Desport JC; Mounier M; Preux PM; Makabakayele K; Camus A; Gayaud JP; Fort M; Dorigny B; Van Dael P
Clin Nutr; 2004 Oct; 23(5):983-8. PubMed ID: 15380886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrograde (ascending) bacterial contamination of enteral diet administration systems.
Payne-James JJ; Rana SK; Bray MJ; McSwiggan DA; Silk DB
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1992; 16(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 1640636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is a 24-h cyclic closed enteral feeding system microbiologically safe in geriatric patients?
Lafourcade P; Boulestrau H; Arnaud-Battandier F; Rogues AM; Texier-Maugein J; Pinganaud G; Bourdel-Marchasson I
Clin Nutr; 2002 Aug; 21(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 12135592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Controlling bacterial contamination of an enteral formula through the use of a unique closed system: contamination, enteral formulas, closed system.
Dentinger B; Faucher KJ; Ostrom SM; Schmidl MK
Nutrition; 1995; 11(6):747-50. PubMed ID: 8719133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbiological evaluation of four enteral feeding systems which have been deliberately subjected to faulty handling procedures.
Beattie TK; Anderton A
J Hosp Infect; 1999 May; 42(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 10363206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microbial contamination of enteral feeding solution and its prevention.
Oie S; Kamiya A; Hironaga K; Koshiro A
Am J Infect Control; 1992 Aug; 20(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 1524268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of high ambient temperature on contamination and physical stability of one-liter ready-to-hang enteral delivery systems.
Hsu TC; Chen NR; Sullivan MM; Kohn-Keeth CL; Meints AS; Shott S; Comer GM
Nutrition; 2000 Mar; 16(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 10705069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A microbiologic study of enteral feeding hang time in a burn hospital: can feeding costs be reduced without compromising patient safety?
Neely AN; Mayes T; Gardner J; Kagan RJ; Gottschlich MM
Nutr Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 21(6):610-6. PubMed ID: 17119167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bacteriological safety of closed enteral nutrition delivery system.
Curtas S; Forbes B; Meguid V; Meguid MM
Nutrition; 1991; 7(5):340-3. PubMed ID: 1804469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microbial contamination of enteral feeding products in thermoneutral and hyperthermal ICU environments.
Perry J; Stankorb SM; Salgueiro M
Nutr Clin Pract; 2015 Feb; 30(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25118176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microbial contamination of enteral feeding solution and its prevention.
Oie S; Kamiya A; Hironaga K; Koshiro A
Am J Infect Control; 1993 Feb; 21(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 8442520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decanting versus sterile pre-filled nutrient containers--the microbiological risks in enteral feeding.
Beattie TK; Anderton A
Int J Environ Health Res; 2001 Mar; 11(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 11260790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of sites of bacterial contamination in an enteral feeding system.
Mathus-Vliegen EM; Bredius MW; Binnekade JM
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2006; 30(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 17047178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of two systems of delivering supplemental protein with standardized tube feedings.
Luther H; Barco K; Chima C; Yowler CJ
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2003; 24(3):167-72; discussion 166. PubMed ID: 12792240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Appropriate handling and storage reduce the risk of bacterial growth in enteral feeding systems reused within 24 hours.
Hubbard GP; Van Wyk J; Grinyer L; Onley R; White S; Fleming CA; Baxter J; Forwood L; Stratton RJ
Nutr Clin Pract; 2024 Apr; 39(2):437-449. PubMed ID: 37635446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bacterial contamination of enteral nutrition in a paediatric hospital.
Roy S; Rigal M; Doit C; Fontan JE; Machinot S; Bingen E; Cezard JP; Brion F; Hankard R
J Hosp Infect; 2005 Apr; 59(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 15749319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
