These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9263877)
1. The influence of sizing and method of fixation on the hydrodynamic function of stentless, free-hand inserted porcine bioprosthesis: an in vitro study. Revanna P; Fisher J; Watterson KG J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 9263877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of free hand suturing technique and zero pressure fixation on the hydrodynamic function of aortic root and aortic valve leaflets. Revanna P; Fisher J; Watterson KG Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Feb; 11(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 9080156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis. Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep]. Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro. Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The pulmonary bioprosthetic heart valve: its unsuitability for use as an aortic valve replacement. Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Booth C; Watterson KG; Fisher J J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):668-78; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 12358404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of sizing on the dynamic function of the free-hand implanted porcine aortic homograft: an in vitro study. Thubrikar MJ; Konstantinov IE; Selim GA; Gong GG; Fowler B; Robicsek F J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 May; 8(3):242-53. PubMed ID: 10399656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics of the porcine pulmonary valve and root with regard to the ross procedure. Nagy ZL; Fisher J; Walker PG; Watterson KG J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Aug; 120(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 10917944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stentless bioprostheses for the small aortic root. Walther T; Falk V; Diegeler A; Autschbach R; Gummert J; Baryalei M; Mohr FW J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():S302-7. PubMed ID: 8953458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position. Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The changing hydrodynamic performance of the decellularized intact porcine aortic root: considerations on in-vitro testing. Bottio T; Tarzia V; Dal Lin C; Buratto E; Rizzoli G; Spina M; Gandaglia A; Naso F; Gerosa G J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jul; 19(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 20845897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position. Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of stenting on the behavior of amino-oleic acid-treated, glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine aortic valves in a sheep model. Ozaki S; Herijgers P; Verbeken E; Van Lommel A; Nishida T; Perek B; Zietkiewicz M; Leunens V; Flameng W J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):552-9; discussion 559-60. PubMed ID: 10947049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Porcine aortic wall flexibility. Fresh vs Denacol fixed vs glutaraldehyde fixed. Zhou J; Quintero LJ; Helmus MN; Lee C; Kafesjian R ASAIO J; 1997; 43(5):M470-5. PubMed ID: 9360087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pericardial stentless aortic valves: effects of sizing on hemodynamics and root geometry. Jin XY; Westaby S Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):55-9. PubMed ID: 11805950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Efficacy of aortic valve replacement with freestyle stentless valve in patients with aortic valve disease]. Sawa Y; Matsuda H Kyobu Geka; 2000 Apr; 53(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 10770060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Frame-mounted porcine valve bioprostheses: preparation during aortic-root dilation. Biomechanics and design considerations. Butterfield M; Fisher J; Lockie KJ; Davies GA; Watterson K J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Dec; 106(6):1181-8. PubMed ID: 8246557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]