These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9263952)

  • 1. Miniature head-mounted microphone for voice perturbation analysis.
    Winholtz WS; Titze IR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Aug; 40(4):894-9. PubMed ID: 9263952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements.
    Titze IR; Winholtz WS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1177-90. PubMed ID: 8114484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conversion of a head-mounted microphone signal into calibrated SPL units.
    Winholtz WS; Titze IR
    J Voice; 1997 Dec; 11(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 9422275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guidelines for selecting microphones for human voice production research.
    Svec JG; Granqvist S
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Nov; 19(4):356-68. PubMed ID: 20601621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of microphone type on acoustic measures of voice.
    Parsa V; Jamieson DG; Pretty BR
    J Voice; 2001 Sep; 15(3):331-43. PubMed ID: 11575630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noise in miniature microphones.
    Thompson SC; LoPresti JL; Ring EM; Nepomuceno HG; Beard JJ; Ballad WJ; Carlson EV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Feb; 111(2):861-6. PubMed ID: 11863188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits of the fiber optic versus the electret microphone in voice amplification.
    Kyriakou K; Fisher HR
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013 Jan; 48(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 23317389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effects of Amplification on Vocal Dose in Teachers with Dysphonia.
    Assad JP; Gama ACC; Santos JN; de Castro Magalhães M
    J Voice; 2019 Jan; 33(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 29122417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of sound amplification on teachers' speech while teaching.
    Jónsdottir V; Rantala L; Laukkanen AM; Vilkman E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2001; 26(3):118-23. PubMed ID: 11824499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
    Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new microphone system for near whispering.
    Choi S; Moon W; Lee JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):801-12. PubMed ID: 12942963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic analysis of the interaction of choral arrangements, musical selection, and microphone location.
    Morris RJ; Mustafa AJ; McCrea CR; Fowler LP; Aspaas C
    J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):568-75. PubMed ID: 16806816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Microphone Type on Acoustical Measures of Synthesized Vowels.
    Kisenwether JS; Sataloff RT
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 25998411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tutorial and Guidelines on Measurement of Sound Pressure Level in Voice and Speech.
    Švec JG; Granqvist S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):441-461. PubMed ID: 29450495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multidimensional Voice Program (MDVP) and amplitude variation parameters in euphonic adult subjects. Normative study.
    Nicastri M; Chiarella G; Gallo LV; Catalano M; Cassandro E
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2004 Dec; 24(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 15952683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in teachers' voice quality during a working day with and without electric sound amplification.
    Jónsdottir V; Laukkanen AM; Siikki I
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(5):267-80. PubMed ID: 12931060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2005; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 15655340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech intelligibility differences across sound classes with in-the-ear and free-field microphones in quiet.
    Estis JM; Parisi JA; Moore RE; Brungart DS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Jun; 112(3):845-59. PubMed ID: 21853774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-Term Stability of One-Inch Condenser Microphones Calibrated at the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
    Wagner RP; Guthrie WF
    J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2015; 120():164-72. PubMed ID: 26958445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data dependent random forest applied to screening for laryngeal disorders through analysis of sustained phonation: acoustic versus contact microphone.
    Verikas A; Gelzinis A; Vaiciukynas E; Bacauskiene M; Minelga J; Hållander M; Uloza V; Padervinskis E
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Feb; 37(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 25618220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.