These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9265273)

  • 1. [Routine ultrasonography in obstetric care in Norway, 1994].
    Backe B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Jun; 117(16):2314-5. PubMed ID: 9265273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Ultrasonography of pregnant women in Denmark 1994-1995--description of its development since 1989-1990].
    Jørgensen FS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Jul; 160(28):4205-10. PubMed ID: 9691818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epidemiological studies of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Denmark 1989-1990 versus 1994-1995.
    Jørgensen FS
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Apr; 78(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 10203297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An epidemiological study of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Denmark 1989-1990.
    Jørgensen FS
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1992 Oct; 71(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 1332370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of ultrasonics in obstetrics in 1988].
    Nafstad P; Backe B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 Oct; 109(29):2975-8. PubMed ID: 2686092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Midwives' and obstetricians' views on appropriate obstetric sonography in Norway.
    Fagerli TA; Mogren I; Adolfsson A; Edvardsson K; Åhman A; Holmlund S; Darj E; Eggebø TM
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():1-5. PubMed ID: 29804752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Ultrasonic examination of pregnant women in Denmark 1989-1990].
    Jørgensen FS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 May; 155(21):1627-32. PubMed ID: 8316999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduced use of diagnostic obstetric ultrasound in Norway. Result of consensus panel recommending routine screening in pregnancy?
    Backe B; Nafstad P; Saetnan AR
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1990; 69(7-8):649-50. PubMed ID: 2094149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Organization of obstetric ultrasonography in Denmark 1995--description of the development since 1990].
    Jørgensen FS
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Jul; 160(28):4199-204. PubMed ID: 9691817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Routine obstetric ultrasound services.
    Walsh CA; McAuliffe F; Kinsella V; McParland P
    Ir Med J; 2013; 106(10):311-3. PubMed ID: 24579412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assurance in perinatal and obstetrical care: the Norwegian approach.
    Backe B
    Aust Clin Rev; 1988 Mar; 8(28):13-8. PubMed ID: 3284514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Routine ultrasound fetal examination in pregnancy: the 'Alesund' randomized controlled trial.
    Eik-Nes SH; Salvesen KA; Okland O; Vatten LJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 15(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 11005114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obstetric ultrasound utilization in the United States: data from various health plans.
    O'Keeffe DF; Abuhamad A
    Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):292-4. PubMed ID: 24176148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overutilization of antenatal care in Norway.
    Backe B
    Scand J Public Health; 2001 Jun; 29(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 11484865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ultrasonography in primary health care--experiences within obstetrics 1983-99].
    Johansen I; Grimsmo A; Nakling J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Aug; 122(20):1995-8. PubMed ID: 12555445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Women think pregnancy management means obstetric ultrasound': Vietnamese obstetricians' views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy.
    Edvardsson K; Graner S; Thi LP; Åhman A; Small R; Lalos A; Mogren I
    Glob Health Action; 2015; 8():28405. PubMed ID: 26519131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound screening: how effective is the service?
    Lalor J; Devane D; Mc Parland P
    Ir Med J; 2006 Oct; 99(9):264-6. PubMed ID: 17144233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extent, regional variation and impact of gynecologist payment models in routine pelvic examinations: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
    Rosenlund IM; Leivseth L; Nilsen I; Førde OH; Revhaug A
    BMC Womens Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 29162106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
    Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Screening with meaning? Use of ultrasound in pregnancy].
    Salvesen KA
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jun; 114(17):1993-4. PubMed ID: 8079332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.