BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9265699)

  • 21. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of five commercial immunoassay data analysis software systems.
    Gerlach RW; White RJ; Deming SN; Palasota JA; van Emon JM
    Anal Biochem; 1993 Jul; 212(1):185-93. PubMed ID: 8368494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improved strategies and optimization of calibration models for real-time PCR absolute quantification.
    Sivaganesan M; Haugland RA; Chern EC; Shanks OC
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4726-35. PubMed ID: 20701947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simulation sample sizes for Monte Carlo partial EVPI calculations.
    Oakley JE; Brennan A; Tappenden P; Chilcott J
    J Health Econ; 2010 May; 29(3):468-77. PubMed ID: 20378190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Profile likelihood-based confidence intervals using Monte Carlo integration for population pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Funatogawa T; Funatogawa I; Yafune A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 16584067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of assay measurement error on parameter estimation in concentration-QTc interval modeling.
    Bonate PL
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 23606626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Significant reduction of the bias among commercial immunoassays for lipoprotein(a) after use of a uniform calibrator.
    Lippi G; Lo Cascio C; Ruzzenente O; Brentegani C; Guidi G
    Clin Chim Acta; 1996 Dec; 256(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9027424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses.
    Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):627-36. PubMed ID: 25704724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rapid immunoassay technique for process monitoring of animal cell fermentations.
    Jervis E; Kilburn DG
    Biotechnol Prog; 1991; 7(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 1366979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantification of D-dimer using a new fully automated assay: its application for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.
    Villa P; Ferrando F; Serra J; Faus H; Mira Y; Vayá A; Aznar J
    Haematologica; 2000 May; 85(5):520-4. PubMed ID: 10800170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. First fully automated immunoassay for anti-Müllerian hormone.
    Gassner D; Jung R
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2014 Aug; 52(8):1143-52. PubMed ID: 24622790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sample size determination for confidence intervals of interaction effects in moderated multiple regression with continuous predictor and moderator variables.
    Shieh G
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):824-35. PubMed ID: 20805605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving uncertainty analysis in kinetic evaluations using iteratively reweighted least squares.
    Gao Z; Green JW; Vanderborght J; Schmitt W
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Oct; 30(10):2363-71. PubMed ID: 21786313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A luminescent oxygen channeling immunoassay for the determination of insulin in human plasma.
    Poulsen F; Jensen KB
    J Biomol Screen; 2007 Mar; 12(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 17259593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Issues for covariance analysis of dichotomous and ordered categorical data from randomized clinical trials and non-parametric strategies for addressing them.
    Koch GG; Tangen CM; Jung JW; Amara IA
    Stat Med; 1998 Aug 15-30; 17(15-16):1863-92. PubMed ID: 9749453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
    Chen X; Wei L
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When one size does not fit all: a simple statistical method to deal with across-individual variations of effects.
    Vindras P; Desmurget M; Baraduc P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39059. PubMed ID: 22723931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Programs for calibration-based Monte Carlo simulation of recharge areas.
    Starn JJ; Bagtzoglou AC
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(3):472-6. PubMed ID: 21967487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monte Carlo modeling provides accurate calibration factors for radionuclide activity meters.
    Zagni F; Cicoria G; Lucconi G; Infantino A; Lodi F; Marengo M
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2014 Dec; 94():158-165. PubMed ID: 25195174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multicenter evaluation of a new immunoassay for intact PTH measurement on the Elecsys System 2010 and 1010.
    Hermsen D; Franzson L; Hoffmann JP; Isaksson A; Kaufman JM; Leary E; Müller C; Nakatsuka K; Nishizawa Y; Reinauer H; Riesen W; Roth HJ; Steinmüller T; Troch T; Bergmann P
    Clin Lab; 2002; 48(3-4):131-41. PubMed ID: 11934215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.