These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9265842)

  • 21. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.
    Baskent D; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. PubMed ID: 12703717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.
    Gani M; Valentini G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Boëx C
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 17216585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. From TEMPO+ to OPUS 2: what can music tests tell us about processor upgrades?
    van Besouw RM; Grasmeder ML
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S40-3. PubMed ID: 21917218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 10466568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Application of a pitch perception model to investigate the effect of stimulation field spread on the pitch ranking abilities of cochlear implant recipients.
    Erfanian Saeedi N; Blamey PJ; Burkitt AN; Grayden DB
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():129-37. PubMed ID: 25193552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital speech processing for cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):299-307. PubMed ID: 1475099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor.
    Lawson DT; Wilson BS; Zerbi M; van den Honert C; Finley CC; Farmer JC; McElveen JT; Roush PA
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 9831150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation.
    Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1538-47. PubMed ID: 16583899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients.
    Hughes ML; Abbas PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1527-37. PubMed ID: 16583898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 15148187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
    Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.
    Lan N; Nie KB; Gao SK; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 May; 51(5):752-60. PubMed ID: 15132501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deactivating Cochlear Implant Electrodes Based on Pitch Information for Users of the ACE Strategy.
    Vickers D; Degun A; Canas A; Stainsby T; Vanpoucke F
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():115-123. PubMed ID: 27080652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of intensity on pitch in electric hearing and its relationship to the speech perception performance of cochlear implantees.
    Umat C; McDermott HJ; McKay CM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006; 17(10):733-46. PubMed ID: 17153721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.
    Koch DB; Osberger MJ; Segel P; Kessler D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):214-23. PubMed ID: 15205549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.