These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9266658)
21. Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective. Straface S Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 7552130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center. Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation. Bessell JR; Patkin M; Isabel L Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Disposable laparoscopic surgical instruments and the economic effects of repackaging. Takeuchi H; Kikuchi I; Kitade M; Kumakiri J; Kinoshita K; Takehiro Y; Tanimura E J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2005 Apr; 15(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 15898913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial. Rizzo J; Bernstein D; Gress F Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10699767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost comparison of reusable and single-use ultrasonic shears for laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Yung E; Gagner M; Pomp A; Dakin G; Milone L; Strain G Obes Surg; 2010 Apr; 20(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 19015932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital]. Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs. Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laparoscopic instruments good outsourcing candidates. Whittington S; Vasey N Hosp Mater Manage; 1997 Jun; 22(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10173016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Disposable and reusable trocars. Watson DI Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Radially dilating trocars are not cost-effective alternatives except for pediatric laparoscopic operations, especially those for undescended testis and imperforate anus. Ng WT; Chang D Surg Endosc; 2001 Apr; 15(4):424-5. PubMed ID: 11395831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs. Hickey M; Fields M Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Why we use reusable surgical packs. Christensen PL Text Rent; 1984 Feb; 67(6):30-4. PubMed ID: 10264867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Estimating the true costs of disposable and reusable instruments. Mancuso R; Bickham MJ AORN J; 1995 Jul; 62(1):39-42, 45, 47-8. PubMed ID: 7574563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The hidden cost calculator: a new way to look at custom packs. Harmer BA Mater Manag Health Care; 1995 Jul; 4(7):18-9. PubMed ID: 10143817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]