These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9267228)

  • 1. Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: a meta analysis.
    Trpkova B; Major P; Prasad N; Nebbe B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 9267228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional and digital lateral headfilms.
    Hagemann K; Vollmer D; Niegel T; Ehmer U; Reuter I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2000; 61(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 10783561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric errors: a comparison between repeat measurements and retaken radiographs.
    Cooke MS; Wei SH
    Aust Dent J; 1991 Feb; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 2029231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique.
    Geelen W; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Kruger M; Hansson LG
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 9699411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided automated landmarking of cephalograms.
    Stamm T; Brinkhaus HA; Ehmer U; Meier N; Bollmann F
    J Orofac Orthop; 1998; 59(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 9577102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Chang HF; Chen KC
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined effects of errors in frontal-view asymmetry diagnosis.
    Pirttiniemi P; Miettinen J; Kantomaa T
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 9009427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks--a three-dimensional computed tomography study.
    Titiz I; Laubinger M; Keller T; Hertrich K; Hirschfelder U
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):276-86. PubMed ID: 21566086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:
    Hwang HW; Park JH; Moon JH; Yu Y; Kim H; Her SB; Srinivasan G; Aljanabi MNA; Donatelli RE; Lee SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31335162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Landmark identification error in posteroanterior cephalometric radiography. A systematic review.
    Leonardi R; Annunziata A; Caltabiano M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):761-5. PubMed ID: 18302479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative assessment of cephalometric errors.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Aug; 15(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 8405136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
    Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
    Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between double readings of clinical measurements.
    Vieira S; Corrente JE
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Oct; 19(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 21986654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances.
    Midtgård J; Björk G; Linder-Aronson S
    Angle Orthod; 1974 Jan; 44(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 4520951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of 'Point A' as the prevalent source of error in cephalometric analysis of lateral radiographs.
    Grogger P; Sacher C; Weber S; Millesi G; Seemann R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1322-1329. PubMed ID: 29650356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.