These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9267229)

  • 1. Comparison of the effects of passive posterior bite-blocks with different construction bites on the craniofacial and dentoalveolar structures.
    Iscan HN; Sarisoy L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 9267229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bite force and its association with stability following Class II/1 functional appliance treatment.
    Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):434-41. PubMed ID: 22828079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the effects of monoblock and twin-block appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
    Tümer N; Gültan AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 10511676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skeletal and dental effects during observation and treatment with a magnetic device.
    Meral O; Yüksel S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 14719738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Severe unilateral scissors-bite with a constricted mandibular arch: Bite turbos and extra-alveolar bone screws in the infrazygomatic crests and mandibular buccal shelf.
    Lee SA; Chang CCH; Roberts WE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):554-569. PubMed ID: 30268266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eruption Guidance Appliance effects in the treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions.
    Janson GR; da Silva CC; Bergersen EO; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 10672211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of vertical chincap therapy on the mandibular morphology in open-bite patients.
    Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan A; Meral O; Taner-Sarisoy L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 12439479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of Frankel's function regulator (FR-4) therapy on the treatment of Angle Class I skeletal anterior open bite malocclusion.
    Erbay E; Uğur T; Ulgen M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 7598110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric study of the upper airways and dentoalveolar height in open bite patients.
    Laranjo F; Pinho T
    Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):467-82. PubMed ID: 25457718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cephalometric comparisons of the craniofacial characteristics of Class II 1 malocclusions with different vertical types in adolescences].
    Ye Q; Zhao ZH; Zhao MY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Aug; 15(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 16955160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class II correction with the Cantilever Bite Jumper.
    Moro A; Janson G; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Petrelli NE; Lauris JP
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 19216611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion.
    Ellis E; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 86(4):277-90. PubMed ID: 6592976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonextraction and nonsurgical treatment of an adult with skeletal Class II open bite with severe retrognathic mandible and temporomandibular disorders.
    Kondo E
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(3):261-76. PubMed ID: 17902331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients.
    Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Büyükerkmen A; Sari Z
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Feb; 25(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 12608728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample.
    Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
    Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment effects of a twin-force bite corrector versus an activator in comparison with an untreated Class II sample: a preliminary report.
    Dalci O; Altug AT; Memikoglu UT
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 24968645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.