324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9267573)
1. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation.
Byloff FK; Darendeliler MA
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):249-60. PubMed ID: 9267573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: The effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends.
Byloff FK; Darendeliler MA; Clar E; Darendeliler A
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 9267574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anchorage provided during intra-arch distal molar movement: a comparison between the Nance appliance and a fixed frontal bite plane.
Bondemark L; Thornéus J
Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 15898386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of the pendulum distalising appliance and cervical headgear on the dentofacial structures.
Toy E; Enacar A
Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 21696108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anchorage quality of deciduous molars versus premolars for molar distalization with a pendulum appliance.
Kinzinger GS; Gross U; Fritz UB; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 15775946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posttreatment evaluation of the distal jet appliance.
Ngantung V; Nanda RS; Bowman SJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 11500660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative analysis of distal maxillary molar movement produced by a new lingual intra-arch Ni-Ti coil appliance and a magnetic appliance.
Bondemark L
Eur J Orthod; 2000 Dec; 22(6):683-95. PubMed ID: 11212604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Kircelli BH; Arman-Ozçirpici A; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e9-339.e17. PubMed ID: 18331928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion - a systematic review.
Al-Thomali Y; Basha S; Mohamed RN
Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Aug; 75(6):394-401. PubMed ID: 28502196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maxillary molar distalization: Pendulum and Fast-Back, comparison between two approaches for Class II malocclusion.
Caprioglio A; Beretta M; Lanteri C
Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21515227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial.
Bondemark L; Karlsson I
Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16279817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
