247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9267575)
1. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 9267575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 10371429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
Schiavoni R
Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
Flores-Mir C; Barnett G; Higgins DW; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
Windmiller EC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction.
Knösel M; Engelke W; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R; Gripp-Rudolph L
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 18678757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
Hägglund P; Segerdal S; Forsberg CM
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
Waters D; Harris EF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance.
Bock N; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):606-13. PubMed ID: 19054814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Aug; 110(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 8760851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
Aslan BI; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
