BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9267576)

  • 1. Case report: modified use of the Jasper Jumper appliance in a skeletal Class II mixed dentition case requiring palatal expansion.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 9267576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance.
    Covell DA; Trammell DW; Boero RP; West R
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 10456598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative evaluation of craniofacial changes with Jasper Jumper therapy.
    Cope JB; Buschang PH; Cope DD; Parker J; Blackwood HO
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 8010519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
    Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment efficiency in skeletal Class II patients treated with the jasper jumper.
    Küçükkeleş N; Ilhan I; Orgun IA
    Angle Orthod; 2007 May; 77(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 17465652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arch development with trans-force lingual appliances.
    Clark WJ
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 15794037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper.
    Weiland FJ; Ingervall B; Bantleon HP; Droacht H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9228837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance--a preliminary report.
    Weiland FJ; Bantleon HP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 7572845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion.
    Ngan P; Wei SH; Hagg U; Yiu CK; Merwin D; Stickel B
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Mar; 23(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 1641462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional appliance treatment of severe Class II malocclusion in the early mixed dentition.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L
    J Clin Orthod; 2003 Feb; 37(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 12674746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition.
    de Almeida MR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Weber U; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):540-7. PubMed ID: 16097222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
    Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The Bimler method in the treatment of sagittal shift of the skeletal base in Class II division 1 malocclusion].
    Barthelemy I; Aussenac J; Barthelemy R; Cadenat H; Boutault F; Fabie M
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1998 Nov; 99(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10088186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Herbst Appliance fixed-functional appliance Class II skeletal malocclusion.
    Rondeau B
    J Gen Orthod; 2001; 12(3):7-17. PubMed ID: 11692451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Realities of craniofacial growth modification.
    Kluemper GT; Spalding PM
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):23-51. PubMed ID: 11905336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.