202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9267959)
1. Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature.
Cook D; Randolph A; Kernerman P; Cupido C; King D; Soukup C; Brun-Buisson C
Crit Care Med; 1997 Aug; 25(8):1417-24. PubMed ID: 9267959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tunneling short-term central venous catheters to prevent catheter-related infection: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.
Randolph AG; Cook DJ; Gonzales CA; Brun-Buisson C
Crit Care Med; 1998 Aug; 26(8):1452-7. PubMed ID: 9710109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Central venous catheter infections in burn patients with scheduled catheter exchange and replacement.
O'Mara MS; Reed NL; Palmieri TL; Greenhalgh DG
J Surg Res; 2007 Oct; 142(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 17631903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scheduled replacement of central venous catheters is not necessary.
Timsit JF
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2000 Jun; 21(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 10879566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.
Mermel LA
Ann Intern Med; 2000 Mar; 132(5):391-402. PubMed ID: 10691590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infectious and mechanical complications of central venous catheters placed by percutaneous venipuncture and over guidewires.
Hagley MT; Martin B; Gast P; Traeger SM
Crit Care Med; 1992 Oct; 20(10):1426-30. PubMed ID: 1395664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature.
Randolph AG; Cook DJ; Gonzales CA; Pribble CG
Crit Care Med; 1996 Dec; 24(12):2053-8. PubMed ID: 8968276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antiseptic chamber-containing hub reduces central venous catheter-related infection: a prospective, randomized study.
León C; Alvarez-Lerma F; Ruiz-Santana S; González V; de la Torre MV; Sierra R; León M; Rodrigo JJ
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1318-24. PubMed ID: 12771597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central venous catheter infections: concepts and controversies.
Reed CR; Sessler CN; Glauser FL; Phelan BA
Intensive Care Med; 1995 Feb; 21(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 7775700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decreasing catheter-related infection and hospital costs by continuous quality improvement.
Civetta JM; Hudson-Civetta J; Ball S
Crit Care Med; 1996 Oct; 24(10):1660-5. PubMed ID: 8874302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by percutaneously inserted, noncuffed central venous catheters: implications for preventive strategies.
Safdar N; Kluger DM; Maki DG
Medicine (Baltimore); 2002 Nov; 81(6):466-79. PubMed ID: 12441903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rates of infection for single-lumen versus multilumen central venous catheters: a meta-analysis.
Dezfulian C; Lavelle J; Nallamothu BK; Kaufman SR; Saint S
Crit Care Med; 2003 Sep; 31(9):2385-90. PubMed ID: 14501971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A controlled trial of scheduled replacement of central venous and pulmonary-artery catheters.
Cobb DK; High KP; Sawyer RG; Sable CA; Adams RB; Lindley DA; Pruett TL; Schwenzer KJ; Farr BM
N Engl J Med; 1992 Oct; 327(15):1062-8. PubMed ID: 1522842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of strategies for central venous catheter replacement.
Olson ME; Lam K; Bodey GP; King EG; Costerton JW
Crit Care Med; 1992 Jun; 20(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 1597034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis.
Veenstra DL; Saint S; Saha S; Lumley T; Sullivan SD
JAMA; 1999 Jan; 281(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 9918482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of infection due to central venous catheters: effect of site of placement and catheter type.
Goetz AM; Wagener MM; Miller JM; Muder RR
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1998 Nov; 19(11):842-5. PubMed ID: 9831940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Central venous catheter replacement in the ICU: new site versus guidewire exchange.
Castelli GP; Pognani C; Stuani A; Cita M; Paladini R
Minerva Anestesiol; 2007 May; 73(5):267-73. PubMed ID: 17159763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inserting tunnelled hemodialysis catheters using elective guidewire exchange from nontunnelled catheters: is there a greater risk of infection when compared with new-site replacement?
Casey J; Davies J; Balshaw-Greer A; Taylor N; Crowe AV; McClelland P
Hemodial Int; 2008 Jan; 12(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 18271841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Oligon catheters and chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges with standard multilumen central venous catheters for prevention of associated colonization and infections in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study.
Arvaniti K; Lathyris D; Clouva-Molyvdas P; Haidich AB; Mouloudi E; Synnefaki E; Koulourida V; Georgopoulos D; Gerogianni N; Nakos G; Matamis D;
Crit Care Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):420-9. PubMed ID: 21926583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefit of heparin in central venous and pulmonary artery catheters: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Randolph AG; Cook DJ; Gonzales CA; Andrew M
Chest; 1998 Jan; 113(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 9440585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
