149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9268858)
1. Advanced digital mammography.
Schilling RB; Cox JD; Sharma SR
J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):133-5. PubMed ID: 9268858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advanced digital mammography.
Schilling RB; Cox JD; Sharma SR
J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):163-5. PubMed ID: 9735459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.
Del Turco MR; Mantellini P; Ciatto S; Bonardi R; Martinelli F; Lazzari B; Houssami N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):860-6. PubMed ID: 17885057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Capacities of digital mammography in screening].
Belotserkovtseva LD; Klimova NV; Samatova TB; Agapova NA
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2008; (4-6):33-6. PubMed ID: 21337748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The significance of MDR (mammo digital-radiography) in breast cancer mass screening].
Kido C
Gan No Rinsho; 1989 May; Spec No():220-6. PubMed ID: 2689663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography.
Zuckerman SP; Maidment ADA; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):222-229. PubMed ID: 28463546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Impact of digital mammography in the detection and management of microcalcifications].
Mellado M; Osa AM; Murillo A; Bermejo R; Burguete A; Pons MJ; Erdozain N
Radiologia; 2013; 55(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22015223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets.
Wang TC; Karayiannis NB
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 9845306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Digital mammography is very useful in mass screening of breast cancer].
Nab HW; Karssemeijer N; van Erning LJ; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Dec; 134(49):2383-7. PubMed ID: 2263263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selective digital enhancement of conventional film mammography.
Hale DA; Cook JF; Baniqued Z; Silva-Hale A; Molloy M; Pearl RH; Hadro NC; Jaques DP
J Surg Oncol; 1994 Jan; 55(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 8289452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Teaching syllabus for radiological aspects of breast cancer screening with digital mammography.
Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):191-4. PubMed ID: 18310613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology.
Pisano ED; Gatsonis CA; Yaffe MJ; Hendrick RE; Tosteson AN; Fryback DG; Bassett LW; Baum JK; Conant EF; Jong RA; Rebner M; D'Orsi CJ
Radiology; 2005 Aug; 236(2):404-12. PubMed ID: 15961755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The diagnostic accuracy of a digital mammography system with photostimulable storage phosphors used with automatic reading].
Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; De Gaspari A; Tacchini S; Camalori M; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1996; 91(1-2):46-51. PubMed ID: 8614730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study.
Bluekens AM; Holland R; Karssemeijer N; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ
Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 23033499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
