These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9268889)

  • 1. Skinline detection in digitized mammograms.
    Abdel-Mottaleb M; Carman CS; Hill CR; Vafai S
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):224-5. PubMed ID: 9268889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized assessment of tissue composition on digitized mammograms.
    Chang YH; Wang XH; Hardesty LA; Chang TS; Poller WR; Good WF; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Aug; 9(8):899-905. PubMed ID: 12186438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple method for automatically locating the nipple on mammograms.
    Chandrasekhar R; Attikiouzel Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):483-94. PubMed ID: 9368104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Highly regular wavelets for the detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
    Lemaur G; Drouiche K; DeConinck J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 12760556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring image texture to separate "difficult" from "easy" mammograms.
    Taylor P; Hajnal S; Dilhuydy MH; Barreau B
    Br J Radiol; 1994 May; 67(797):456-63. PubMed ID: 8193892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digitized mammograms: a preliminary clinical evaluation and the potential for telemammography.
    Murphy JM; O'Hare NJ; Wheat D; McCarthy PA; Dowling A; Hayes R; Bowmer H; Wilson GF; Molloy MP
    J Telemed Telecare; 1999; 5(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 10628036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital mammography is very useful in mass screening of breast cancer].
    Nab HW; Karssemeijer N; van Erning LJ; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Dec; 134(49):2383-7. PubMed ID: 2263263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
    Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Field nonuniformity correction for quantitative analysis of digitized mammograms.
    Pawluczyk O; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 11339739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digitizing and consolidating mammograms and other images for teaching applications.
    Bassignani MJ; LoRusso AP; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 16679282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
    Kus P; Karagoz I
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized detection of breast masses in digitized mammograms.
    Varela C; Tahoces PG; Méndez AJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Feb; 37(2):214-26. PubMed ID: 16620805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Thickness correction of mammographic images by means of a global parameter model of the compressed breast.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):799-806. PubMed ID: 15250632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Algorithm for the detection of fine clustered calcifications on film mammograms.
    Fam BW; Olson SL; Winter PF; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1988 Nov; 169(2):333-7. PubMed ID: 3174981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normalization of local contrast in mammograms.
    Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Jul; 19(7):731-8. PubMed ID: 11055788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography.
    Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.