These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9268889)

  • 21. Incomplete skin representation in digital mammograms.
    Burgess AE; Kang H
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2834-8. PubMed ID: 15543791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Direct digital mammography using a scanned-slot CCD imaging system.
    Yaffe MJ
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 8302210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A breast density index for digital mammograms based on radiologists' ranking.
    Boone JM; Lindfors KK; Beatty CS; Seibert JA
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3):101-15. PubMed ID: 9718500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms?
    Pisano ED; Chandramouli J; Hemminger BM; DeLuca M; Glueck D; Johnston RE; Muller K; Braeuning MP; Pizer S
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 May; 10(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 9165422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
    Gur D; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Ganott M; Hakim C; Hardesty L; Poller WR; Shah R; Wallace L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 14759985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
    Fenton JJ; Taplin SH; Carney PA; Abraham L; Sickles EA; D'Orsi C; Berns EA; Cutter G; Hendrick RE; Barlow WE; Elmore JG
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(14):1399-409. PubMed ID: 17409321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mass detection in single-view mammograms.
    Abdel-Mottaleb M; Carman CS; Hill CR; Eliot G; Mankovich NJ
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):222-3. PubMed ID: 9268888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative assessment of percent breast density: analog versus digital acquisition.
    Harvey JA
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Dec; 3(6):611-6. PubMed ID: 15560719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comment on "Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms" [Med. Phys. 23, 1337-1345 (1996)].
    Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 1997 Feb; 24(2):313, 315. PubMed ID: 9048373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
    Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scale-space signatures for the detection of clustered microcalculations in digital mammograms.
    Netsch T; Peitgen HO
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Sep; 18(9):774-86. PubMed ID: 10571382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Thickness-equalization processing for mammographic images.
    Byng JW; Critten JP; Yaffe MJ
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):564-8. PubMed ID: 9114122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
    Heinlein P; Drexl J; Schneider W
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):402-13. PubMed ID: 12760557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast skin-line detection using dynamic programming.
    Silva CA; Lima CG; Correia JH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7775-8. PubMed ID: 22256141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An artificial intelligent algorithm for tumor detection in screening mammogram.
    Zheng L; Chan AK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Jul; 20(7):559-67. PubMed ID: 11465463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Study of mass segmentation algorithm for digital mammograms].
    Chen L; Zhang K; Jin Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 25(6):1282-4. PubMed ID: 19166192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis system for detection of masses on digitized mammograms.
    Radovic M; Milosevic M; Ninkovic S; Filipovic N; Peulic A
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(6):757-74. PubMed ID: 26409521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.