These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9268904)

  • 21. Observer sensitivity to small differences: a multipoint rank-order experiment.
    Good WF; Sumkin JH; Dash N; Johns CM; Zuley ML; Rockette HE; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 10430118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Irreversible JPEG compression of digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold.
    Slone RM; Muka E; Pilgram TK
    Radiology; 2003 Aug; 228(2):425-9. PubMed ID: 12893900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography.
    Fink C; Hallscheidt PJ; Noeldge G; Kampschulte A; Radeleff B; Hosch WP; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):481-6. PubMed ID: 11804922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pneumoconiosis: comparison of digitized and conventional radiographs.
    Mannino DM; Kennedy RD; Hodous TK
    Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 8497632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal subtraction for the detection of hazy pulmonary opacities on chest radiography.
    Tsubamoto M; Johkoh T; Kozuka T; Tomiyama N; Hamada S; Honda O; Mihara N; Koyama M; Maeda M; Nakamura H; Fujiwara K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Aug; 179(2):467-71. PubMed ID: 12130454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Temporal subtraction in chest radiography: mutual information as a measure of image quality.
    Armato SG; Sensakovic WF; Passen SJ; Engelmann R; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5675-82. PubMed ID: 20095280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interpretation of subtle interstitial lung abnormalities: conventional versus storage phosphor radiography.
    Kido S; Ikezoe J; Takeuchi N; Kondoh H; Tomiyama N; Jokoh T; Kohno N; Takashima S; Yamagami H; Naito H
    Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 8475302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison.
    Piraino DW; Davros WJ; Lieber M; Richmond BJ; Schils JP; Recht MP; Grooff PN; Belhobek GH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 9888764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
    Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs.
    Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Lanhede B; Almén A; Sandborg M; McVey G; Mattsson S; Panzer W; Besjakov J; Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Alm Carlsson G; Dance DR; Tylén U; Zankl M
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 77(915):204-15. PubMed ID: 15020361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats.
    MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Kim T; Giger ML; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 3406396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized posterior-anterior chest radiographs.
    Erickson BJ; Manduca A; Persons KR; Earnest F; Hartman TE; Harms GF; Brown LR
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3):97-102. PubMed ID: 9268903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
    Uffmann M; Neitzel U; Prokop M; Kabalan N; Weber M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):642-50. PubMed ID: 15858104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Lyttkens K; Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Andersson B; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Jarlman O; Lindberg CG; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 8075185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
    Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 80(960):984-8. PubMed ID: 17940130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of simulated nodules on clinical radiographs: dose reduction at digital posteroanterior chest radiography.
    Kroft LJ; Veldkamp WJ; Mertens BJ; van Delft JP; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 17057066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Eye-tracking of nodule detection in lung CT volumetric data.
    Diaz I; Schmidt S; Verdun FR; Bochud FO
    Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2925-32. PubMed ID: 26127046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs.
    Herron JM; Bender TM; Campbell WL; Sumkin JH; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 10751483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.